Search for: "Server v State"
Results 641 - 660
of 2,499
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
Solicitor General to participate in oral argument as an amicus in the case of Unicolors v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 1:07 pm
They asked why the IRS seems to be ignoring that 2010 decision—United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 7:42 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 10:59 am
By Eric Goldman Universal Tube & Rollform Equipment Corp. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 6:24 pm
Accordingly, in 2010 the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decided in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 3:35 am
In Tucows.Com Co. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 2:46 pm
While the independent claims may state that such operations be performed in a particular environment, such as on a hand-held device, a web server, a database or a match aggregator, such requirements or limitations to an abstract idea do not change the focus the claims. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 3:30 am
Smith v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 3:30 am
Smith v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:18 am
U.S. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 8:02 am
Article 9 of the 2016 regulations provides that the police or prosecutors may extract digital data from original storage media (e.g., servers, hard drives) that are located outside of mainland China (i.e., including servers in Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan) “through the Internet” and may perform “remote network inspections” of such computer information systems. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 7:04 am
Best Carpet Values, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 2:39 pm
On May 7, 2009, the New Jersey Supreme Court held in Bauer v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 7:56 am
In G&G Oil Co. of Indiana, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 10:05 am
By Eric Goldman Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 3:03 pm
Plaintiff initially served the defendant with a private process server, then through the Texas Secretary of State. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:59 pm
The California-based company was part of the Tamiz v Google Inc 2013 case in England and Wales. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 4:10 am
” United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:21 pm
This is one of the reasons I get so worked up about the current IWF when people are asking me if I won't think of the children.There is also the possibility, as we saw just last week, of pressure being exerted not on ISPs but on the people who run domain name servers and the registrars that keep domain names valid. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:35 am
With respect to L & T, however, the record includes an affidavit of service from a process server indicating that service upon L & T in this action was effected by delivery of the original summons and complaint to the Secretary of State, which creates a presumption of proper service on L & T (see CPLR 311[a][1]; Business Corporation Law § 306; Thas v Dayrich Trading, Inc., 78 AD3d 1163, 1164). [read post]
