Search for: "Shorts v. Superior Court" Results 641 - 660 of 1,668
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2015, 6:47 am
A complaint which falls short of the Rule 8(a) standard may be dismissed if it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 4:54 pm
Superior Court Of Ventura County (Spencer) (August 31, 2009) ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (2d Civil No.B211431). [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 9:51 am by Eric Goldman
A California Superior Court confirmed that Harris was right in 2013, and indeed Section 230 clearly prevents the prosecution. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  For more thoughts on the court's opinion in Business Roundtable, see Shareholder Access and Uneconomic Economic Analysis: Business Roundtable v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:29 am
 This moggy, by contrast, has just published a rather polemical article in the Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, whose controversial thesis is that non-specialist superior courts can not in general be trusted with patent matters. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:17 pm by Yosie Saint-Cyr
In Ciszkowski v Canac Kitchens, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice concluded that a long-term employee was constructively dismissed when he considered himself demoted upon his return to work from heart surgery. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 3:15 pm
Subsequent to that hearing, several other news outlets released the same information that the Superior Court had enjoined channel 7 from releasing. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 2:54 pm
The State cross-appealed the sentence arguing it was inappropriately short. [read post]