Search for: "Smith v. Field"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,035
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2012, 5:55 am
In Bitler v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:21 pm
The Department of Corrections’ own doctors diagnosed her with Gender Identity Disorder and the Seventh Circuit recently stated in Fields v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
To put it in perspective, my group at the University of Toronto was working on multi-touchin 1984 (Lee, Buxton & Smith, 1985), the same year that the first Macintosh computer was released, and we were not the first. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 10:14 am
Plaintiff definitely has only a small playing field left. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:43 am
In Norman IP Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:34 am
Judgment for defendants Counsel: For the claimant: James Abrahams For the first defendant: Anna Edwards-Stuart For the second defendant: Daniel Alexander QC, Charlotte May Solicitors: For the claimant: Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP For the first defendant: Manches LLP For the second defendant: Herbert Smith LLP LTL 6/8/2012 [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 6:21 am
Implications For Employers Bolden is a significant decision for employers as courts continue to redefine the playing field in the wakes of Wal-Mart v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:57 am
Follow @InfoGovernance eDiscovery News Content and Considerations 2nd Circuit Rejects Key Litigation Hold Standard - http://bit.ly/NFI9EM (John Jablonski) A Quick Forensics Lesson: The Smart Phone Is Much More than Just a Hard Drive - http://bit.ly/Q1N9tR (Greg Buckles) An Uncertain Standard for Cost Shifting Can Restore a Level Playing Field - http://bit.ly/NgYZxk (Matthew Prewitt) Are Seed Sets the New Keyword? [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:52 am
" It follows that, as Pumfrey J said in Halliburton Energy Services Inc v Smith International (North Sea) Ltd [2005] EWHC 1623 (Pat), [2006] RPC at [60] "over-meticulousness is not to be equated to carefulness. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:25 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Douglas v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:48 am
Smith v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 2:46 pm
Rev. 1071, 1104 (1994). [9] Warner-Jenkinson Co., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:43 am
”); Smith v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 8:55 am
Case C-137/12 European Commission v Council of the European Union is a battle of the Euro-titans, with the European Commission picking on the Council on a matter of policy as well as principle. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 11:45 am
Given Switzerland’s early entry in this field, it is the most popular choice for “tourism suicide”, a phenomenon that induced Lee Carter to sign on as a plaintiff in Carter v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm
Smith Jr., and Senior U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:37 pm
Innovention Toys, LLC, v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:18 am
In particular, there is significant concern that the First Circuit’s decision in Milward v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:18 am
United States v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:19 am
Lord Denning Jarvis v. [read post]
