Search for: "Smith v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 641 - 660
of 814
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm
Justice Department or from a special three-judge District Court in the nation’s capital. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
First, it could seek preclearance from the Department of Justice, which proceeds in a more expedited fashion in that the Department has 60 days to object to the change. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:45 am
The federal complaint is part of an effort by the Justice Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) at the U.S. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:30 am
Beginning in 2010, then Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division, Christine Varney announced that a new antitrust task force of investigators from the Justice Department had joined with investigators from the United States Department of Agriculture, to spearhead new enforcement oversight into the agricultural sector. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
Smith v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:26 am
A little while back, I was considering whether to undertake an empirical study into whether law enforcement officers were relying on the inventory-search exception to the warrant requirement more often after the United States Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Arizona v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am
However, last year, in an abrupt reversal, the United States Supreme Court dramatically limited the extraterritorial application of U.S. securities laws in Morrison v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 10:08 am
The first, United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:47 am
Smith at this blog reports on Monday’s oral argument in Messerschmidt v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
United States, a case about the harmless error standard. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:37 am
United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:18 pm
(Michael Smith previewed the case yesterday for this blog.) [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:15 am
Guy on the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 8:50 am
State Department about the surrender to officials in Mexico. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:00 pm
The part about websites “subject to seizure in the United States” refers to 18 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am
Admittedly the Justice case recently experienced a vogue of attention in the United States, particularly among lawyers looking for possible precedents for bringing charges against the authors of the “torture memos” in Bush’s Justice Department.[4] But even this brief renaissance of interest quickly waned as the precedential relevance of the Justice appeared smaller than hoped.[5] The fact that the NMT program has long been… [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Ricci v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
See more detail at the Pennsylvania Department of State's Election Returns website.] [read post]
