Search for: "Speake v. United States" Results 641 - 660 of 8,143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2014, 1:18 pm by DMLP Staff
Naffe appealed the ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:18 pm by DMLP Staff
Naffe appealed the ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:18 pm by DMLP Staff
Naffe appealed the ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 2:22 pm by Russell Mace
The Supreme Court of South Carolina previously ruled under State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
Yesterday, the Court heard arguments in United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:58 pm by Sean Hanover
United States, 356 U.S. 369, 383 (1958) (Justice Frankfurter concurring); United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 9:25 am by Vanessa Sauter
Practically speaking, beyond a handful of diplomats, Trump’s latest travel ban may not actually bar any North Koreans who are capable of entering the United States in the first place. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:46 am by Kali Borkoski
In Court coverage from the weekend, Adam Liptak of the New York Times previews United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 8:17 am by Joel R. Brandes
As the district court found, Ermini and Vittori leased a house in the United States and put their house in Italy on the market; enrolled the children in school and extracurricular activities in the United States; planned to open a business in the United States; prepared to move all of their belongings to the United States; and shifted Daniele's all-important medical care and treatment to the United States.… [read post]
And gay people can now marry, thanks to a changing climate of opinion, and thanks to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
14 May 2009, 2:40 pm
    Wrote Whatley, "In interpreting the Full Faith and Credit Clause, the United States Supreme Court has held that '[a] final judgment in one State, if rendered by a court with adjudicatory authority over the subject matter and persons governed by the judgment, qualifies for recognition throughout the land," citing Baker v. [read post]