Search for: "State of Delaware v. Shorts." Results 641 - 660 of 846
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2010, 8:19 am by Kara OBrien
In that motion, the parties argued that the stay was warranted pending the outcome of the lawsuit because the Commission erred in appraising the costs the rules would impose and failed to estimate properly the frequency with which proxy access would be used; the new rules undermine existing state law and fail to serve their stated goal of empowering shareholders; and the Commission erred by including investment companies under the new rules. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 6:34 am by David Zaring
  And to suggest otherwise, as the COP does, seems to me to be a basic error in the application of the state action doctrine, unless they're arguing that banks are now state actors, via TARP (no way), or that, because of Shelley v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm by Mandelman
  But first a brief message from one of our sponsors… FADE IN… :30 Spot, Federal Reserve Are you tired of feeling insolvent and short on cash? [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:24 pm
Now that we have the reports from the third and final day of the meeting in Salt Lake City of ECUSA's Executive Council, we are finally able to fill in the picture of what is going on among the Church's elected and appointed officials. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:13 pm
”   The Court of Appeals was asked to rule on questions of New York law certified and submitted by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and the Delaware Court of Chancery in the cases of Kirschner v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 12:20 pm by Steve Bainbridge
” Chamber v SEC proxy stay request (PDF) Chamber v SEC proxy petition (PDF) What others are saying about the proxy access rules. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  In short, Yucaipa and Selectica provide a road map for companies wanting to increase the risks associated with access. [read post]