Search for: "State of New York v Robert V." Results 641 - 660 of 4,742
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Assn., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v Pataki, 259 AD2d 826, 827-828 [1999], lv dismissed and denied 93 NY2d 993 [1999]; Matter of McGuinn v City of New York, 219 AD2d 489, 490 [1995], lv dismissed and denied 87 NY2d 966 [1996]; Matter of Cassidy v New York City Dept. of Correction, 95 AD2d 733, 734-735 [1983]; Matter of Serth v New York State Dept. of Transp., 79 AD2d 801, 802 [1980]). [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Assn., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v Pataki, 259 AD2d 826, 827-828 [1999], lv dismissed and denied 93 NY2d 993 [1999]; Matter of McGuinn v City of New York, 219 AD2d 489, 490 [1995], lv dismissed and denied 87 NY2d 966 [1996]; Matter of Cassidy v New York City Dept. of Correction, 95 AD2d 733, 734-735 [1983]; Matter of Serth v New York State Dept. of Transp., 79 AD2d 801, 802 [1980]). [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Assn., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v Pataki, 259 AD2d 826, 827-828 [1999], lv dismissed and denied 93 NY2d 993 [1999]; Matter of McGuinn v City of New York, 219 AD2d 489, 490 [1995], lv dismissed and denied 87 NY2d 966 [1996]; Matter of Cassidy v New York City Dept. of Correction, 95 AD2d 733, 734-735 [1983]; Matter of Serth v New York State Dept. of Transp., 79 AD2d 801, 802 [1980]). [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Assn., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v Pataki, 259 AD2d 826, 827-828 [1999], lv dismissed and denied 93 NY2d 993 [1999]; Matter of McGuinn v City of New York, 219 AD2d 489, 490 [1995], lv dismissed and denied 87 NY2d 966 [1996]; Matter of Cassidy v New York City Dept. of Correction, 95 AD2d 733, 734-735 [1983]; Matter of Serth v New York State Dept. of Transp., 79 AD2d 801, 802 [1980]). [read post]
10 May 2022, 12:49 pm by Jeff Kosseff
And two of those nine—Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch—have argued that the Supreme Court should reconsider New York Times v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 8:09 am by DONALD SCARINCI
In 1852, the New York Tribune reported that the Supreme Court would rule in Pennsylvania v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:26 am by Emma Snell
Secretary of State Antony Blinken has told his Ukrainian counterpart that this progress — marked by Kyiv Embassy charge d’affaires Kristina Kvien’s visit yesterday to commemorate V-E Day — is a testament to Ukraine’s success and Moscow’s failure in the early phase of the war. [read post]
7 May 2022, 8:20 am by David Post
One of innumerable examples, from the lead editorial in today's New York Times: "Many who oppose Roe v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:25 am by Emma Snell
Dzhabarov told the state-run RIA Novosti news agency Europe’s leaders “have gone a little crazy”. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:04 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Capitol sent interview requests to three Republican members of Congress, according to the New York Times. [read post]
3 May 2022, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Woods in the Southern District of New York want to use email to serve summons on dozens of defendants located in the People’s Republic of China. [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:33 am by Michael C. Dorf
We can expect similarly bold moves in the near future.Within two months, the Court could find a constitutional right to carry loaded guns on the New York City subways. [read post]
3 May 2022, 4:18 am by Emma Snell
All 27 E.U. member states would need to back the new sanctions proposals, and diplomats warn that a consensus might take some time. [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:09 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
How Chief Justice John Roberts will ultimately vote, and whether he will join an already written opinion or draft his own, is unclear…” See also The New York Times: “…The release of the 98-page document is unprecedented in modern times. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
The Financial Times, TechCrunch, Verge, BBC, New York Times and Reuters are just some of the many to publish responses to the news. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
See Note 44, ante (warning against broad liability schemes that would encourage landlords to act as law enforcement).[15] The New York intermediate appellate court took a similar view in Gill v. [read post]