Search for: "State v. Amaral" Results 641 - 654 of 654
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2007, 7:31 am
The fear that a constitutional vision rooted in text and history would mean jettisoning Roe v. [read post]
20 May 2007, 9:57 am
The US had submitted a brief, I believe, for restructuring Mississippi higher eduction according to the principle of Green v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 6:16 am
Bob Egelko of the San Francisco Chronicle writes today about the Jan. 24th 7th Circuit decision in the Indiana case of Mayer v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 2:00 pm
Nahal Toosi of the Associated Press reports here on Long Island Care at Home v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:33 am
"The most engaging part of the conference was its finale, a moot court re-argument of Scott v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 2:12 pm
Coan has this editorial on Hein v. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 11:00 pm
Quite apart from these quibbles, there is the difficulty that Silberman, as a lower court judge, is still bound by the Supreme Court's 1939 decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 1:16 pm
Texas, which declared the state's anti-sodomy law unconstitutional. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 3:08 am
We can then follow Akhil Amar's contention that Article V applies to governmental initiated constitutional change and does not prevent the sovereign authority of the people from adopting a more majoritarian process. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 8:52 am
It's by UC Hastings College of Law Professor Vikram David Amar. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 11:03 am
[For more analysis, see Vik Amar's excellent discussion on FindLaw before the dismissals of the suits challenging the DRA.] [read post]