Search for: "State v. Armstrong" Results 641 - 660 of 684
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2008, 10:27 am
 However, in the case of Committee to Save the Hollywoodland Specific Plan and Hollywood Heritage v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 10:38 am
9:00 a.m. sesstion:  Culture, Tradition and Language in Cross-Border Negotiations and International Conflict presented by Professor John Barkai, University of Hawaii; Andrew Aglionby, Baker & McKenzie; and, Michael Zacharia, Former Exec. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
Despite the majority's holding to the contrary, I believe this case must be controlled by our decision in Armstrong v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 2:38 pm
For the same reasons, we reach the same result here.In State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:07 pm
"Petitioners Jason Puerto, Jeffrey Armstrong, Thomas J. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 12:02 pm
Collagen Corp., 54 Cal.App.4th 1474 (3d Dist. 1997), and Armstrong v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:41 am
But you'll rarely find another oral argument as philosophical than the one just completed in Baze v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 6:53 pm
In 1996, the Supreme court upheld the constitutionality of the 100:1 crack-to-powder cocaine sentencing ratio.in Armstrong v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 7:16 am
Springfield, IL 62704 Phone: (217) 782-9696 (V/TTY) Fax: (217) 524-5339 Web: http://www.state.il.usagency/ipcdd Down Syndrome Down Syndrome Development Counsel P.O. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:03 am
Below you will find the Pennsylvania UCP affiliates: UCP of Pennsylvania 1902 Market Street Camp Hill, PA 17011 Phone: (717) 761-6129; (866) 761-6129 (Toll Free) Fax: (717) 761-2534 E-mail: info@ucpofpa.org Web: http://www.ucpofpa.org UCP Central PA 44 South 38th Street Camp Hill, PA 17011 Phone: (717) 975-0611 Fax: (717) 975-0839 E-mail: kidscenter@ucpcentralpa.org Web: http://www.ucpcentralpa.org Administrative Office/Alternatives West 925 Linda Lane Camp Hill, PA 17011 Phone: (717)… [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 7:18 am
" The court also relied on McCoy in Armstrong v. [read post]