Search for: "State v. Austria" Results 641 - 660 of 701
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Kluwer IP Reporter
Apparently it was also brought forward during the meeting of the EPO’s Administrative Council late June by various member states. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
Apparently it was also brought forward during the meeting of the EPO’s Administrative Council late June by various member states. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 7:13 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Earlier, an ex parte PI order was granted by the UPC Local Division Dusseldorf in June 2023 (ORD_ 541204/2023, in the case of myStromer AG v Revolt Zycling AG), The order in the 10x Genomics case was issued yesterday by Presiding Judge Matthias Zigann at the Munich local division of the UPC. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Matthew Flinn
In that respect, as was explained in a previous post, the in the recent case of Schalk and Kopf v Austria, the European Court of Human Rights decided that at this point in time, Article 12 does not require States to allow same-sex marriage. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 8:58 am by Veronika Gaertner
Therefore, if the habitual residence of the child changes, the joint responsibility of non-married parents established under the law of the child’s former residence state may become extinct under the law of the new residence state. [read post]
9 May 2012, 2:51 am by Legal Beagle
" If there is any consolation to be had, Roberts believes, it is the lack of success they have at fulfilling their stated goals. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
(The Trademark Blog)   Australia Intellectual Property Awareness Foundation targets Australia’s children (TorrentFreak) Nielsen hugely underestimates BitTorrent traffic, according to MiniNova stats (TorrentFreak)   Austria Supreme Court rules domain name containing another’s trade mark does not infringe on the trademark owner’s rights as such (Domain Name / Nom de Domaine!) [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
(The Trademark Blog)   Australia Intellectual Property Awareness Foundation targets Australia’s children (TorrentFreak) Nielsen hugely underestimates BitTorrent traffic, according to MiniNova stats (TorrentFreak)   Austria Supreme Court rules domain name containing another’s trade mark does not infringe on the trademark owner’s rights as such (Domain Name / Nom de Domaine!) [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 4:22 am by Dáire McCormack-George
Accordingly, the member states should support the right to education, in particular those facing disadvantages, or having special needs. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 1:38 am by Veronika Gaertner
Celní úrad Tabor) -  the English abstract reads as follows: The dogma that claims of the State based on its penal, revenue or other public law are not enforceable abroad – a doctrine also known as the revenue rule – is more and more displaced by European instruments obliging the Member States to collect public law claims of their fellow Member States. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:31 am
The special provision in Art. 65 for Germany, Austria and Hungary, excluding the application of Arts. 6(2) and 11 for third party proceedings and substituting certain national rules of jurisdiction, should be deleted, as being incompatible with an EC Regulation intended to have uniform effect. 4. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 12:51 pm by Harold O'Grady
In the 16th Century Pope Sixtus V commissioned the architect Domenico Fontana to create new buildings to house the Vatican collections, and these are still used today. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 11:59 am
Introducing his summary of the relevant cases with a recap of Von Hannover (and clarifying that the decision only related to the more anoydne, non-official photographs in the controversial case), Carolan discussed Pfeifer v Austria. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:04 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
At BlawgIT, Brett Trout writes about the AMP v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Will Baude
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:13 am by INFORRM
We know from cases such as Mosley, McKennit v Ash and Naomi Campell that it covers the publication of information that is obviously private, such as that pertaining to health, medical treatment, sexual life, private finance and family life. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am by Ralf Michaels
The current state of the CSDDD already represents a milestone. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 1:02 am by Jan von Hein
As to the latter, the article argues that there is neither a contradiction to the ECJ’s previous decision in Google v. [read post]