Search for: "State v. B. P."
Results 641 - 660
of 6,783
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am
The roadmap expressly states it is not a guide to future compliance, but rather an information document setting out Ofcom’s present thinking. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
There being two legitimate aims, the next question was whether the restriction was proportionate to them; the means chosen to achieve those aim must (a) be rationally connected to the objective and not be arbitrary, unfair or based on irrational considerations, (b) impair the right as little as possible, and (c) be such that their effects on rights are proportional to the objective … (Murphy v IRTC [46] (Barrington J), following Heaney v… [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 5:32 am
Accordingly, in this procedural posture, the Court will deny the Parties' joint motion to seal… And a similar result across the state line in Judge Gerald Pappert's opinion the day before, in Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
(b) Allowing a copper mine to take over one of the most sacred sites of a religion? [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 4:40 am
Stevens v Wheeler 2022 NY Slip Op 31699(U) April 27, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 151129/2021 Judge: David B. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 11:40 am
” El Koussa v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 10:55 am
From Reade v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 8:35 pm
And the applicant must score 80% on a written exam: (b) a minimum of two hours of a live-fire range training course. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 6:33 am
See P. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:24 pm
” The Federalist No. 23, p. 148 (A. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 11:08 am
I’m continuing my coverage of dangerous Internet bills in the California legislature. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 12:37 pm
” State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
[See United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
[See United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
Way to deal with specimen laundering, as in LTTB and in Ohio State’s THE. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:51 am
P. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:51 am
P. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:54 am
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
Janis & Dinwoodie were not fans of symmetry in P v. [read post]