Search for: "State v. Body"
Results 641 - 660
of 14,862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Lord Bannatyne stated that it was not his task “to prefer one body of evidence to another rather it was for the pursuer to demonstrate that the views of the defenders’ experts were illogical or irrational. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:33 pm
Charlie’s Waste Services, LLC v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 7:30 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: SC18914 - State v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 6:04 pm
All One God Faith, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 8:01 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Property Law Opinions Body: SC18417 - Alexandre v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:22 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:41 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Property Law Opinions;Tort Law Opinions Body: AC36839 - Delahunty v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:56 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: AC34403 - State v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 11:37 am
Category: Recent Decisions Body: AC32856 - State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:07 am
For decades, affirmative action programs were implemented within educational institutions across the country with the stated goal of maintaining a diverse student body. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 7:50 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: Below is a list of criminal law Appellate Court opinions issued in October 2009: AC29404 - State v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 8:14 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: AC31396 - State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 2:23 am
Maxwell v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Gore concurrence theory.The theory, again, is that when the Constitution confers powers (and duties) on the “Legislature” of each state, the Constitution is singling out a particular body of state government (the standing elected lawmaking body), and excluding other organs of state government, such as state courts and the people of each state in their direct-lawmaking capacity. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:59 am
§ 1605(a)(2))—Commercial Activity Elsewhere with Direct Effect in United States Not Found Under Standard Adopted in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:59 am
§ 1605(a)(2))—Commercial Activity Elsewhere with Direct Effect in United States Not Found Under Standard Adopted in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 7:17 am
The narrow 5-4 decision in US v. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 2:35 pm
The case is called Brooks v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:04 am
I have my own thoughts, including that, from Justice Stevens' perspective, state sovereign immunity might be one of the more vulnerable bodies of Rehnquist Court jurisprudence going forward (see, e.g., his majority opinion in Central Virginia Community College v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:19 pm
In my earlier post, I mentioned this passage reminded me of United States v. [read post]
