Search for: "State v. Cabine" Results 641 - 660 of 766
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2012, 9:53 am by Mary L. Dudziak
Meanwhile, at Guantanamo and elsewhere, the United States holds enemy combatants “for the duration of hostilities. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:11 pm
Meanwhile, at Guantánamo and elsewhere, the United States holds enemy combatants “for the duration of hostilities. [read post]
13 May 2020, 4:02 am by SHG
But there are about 2300 local prosecutors in the United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
The fundamental operative structure of the UNGP State duty to protect was grounded on the premise of international legality embedded within the principles of the state system. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 3:09 pm by Francesca Procaccini
The Sixth Amendment contains within it the right to a public trial, and the government has not claimed that that this right is impracticable or inapplicable to defendants at Guantanamo Bay under the standards laid out in Boumediene v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 11:01 pm by Dennis Crouch
. *** In its en banc decision in Wi-Fi One, LLC v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by Albert W. Alschuler
”The Court Apparently Scraps its DictumHeller’s statement about the endurance of felon-in-possession laws was consistent with the Court’s ruling in that case and McDonald, but it seems flatly inconsistent with last year’s decision in New York State Pistol & Rifle Association v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 1:10 pm by Asheesh Agarwal
In the last major monopolization case in the technology sector, U.S. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Apr. 17, 2009)Affirming JV ($10K wages; $20K comps; $220K atty fees) for fired rental car company station manager on her sex harass-based retaliation/discharge state law claims; but reducing punitive damages award from $500K to $120K)Commentary on previously reported Federal Appellate Court decisions> 3rd Cir.o o No need to accommodate shorter commuteParker v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]