Search for: "State v. Cherry" Results 641 - 660 of 736
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2009, 5:00 am
5-7-2009 New Jersey:The New Jersey Supreme Court today upheld a lower court ruling invalidating ordinances in Cherry Hill and Galloway Township that severely restricted where registered sex offenders could live.The decision ( G.H. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:02 am by Dave Rein
The Second Circuit waited until the American Bar Association's Intellectual Property conference and the bloom of the cherry trees to release its long-awaited decision in Rescuecom Corp. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 5:01 am
  Currently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is considering Judge McMahon’s dismissal of Southern Cherry Street LLC v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 5:57 pm
  The piece is titled "Of Atkins and Men: Deviations from Clinical Definitions of Mental Retardation in Death Penalty Cases", and here is the abstract: Under Atkins v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 5:35 pm by Michael Stevens
Intervenor Wine and Spirits Wholesalers of Kentucky, Inc., appeals the district court’s grant of partial summary judgment to Plaintiffs Cherry Hill Vineyards, LLC, William G. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 5:35 pm by Michael Stevens
Intervenor Wine and Spirits Wholesalers of Kentucky, Inc., appeals the district court’s grant of partial summary judgment to Plaintiffs Cherry Hill Vineyards, LLC, William G. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 11:49 am
  Then there was State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
Court rules that the appointing authority made its appointments consistent with the requirements of Section 61.1 of the Civil Service LawMatter of Cherry v New York State Civ. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:12 pm
His plan also allows insurance companies to cherry pick their state laws, which would allow them to evade hard fought state requirements to cover preventive and prescription coverage, and provide the bare minimum coverage. [read post]