Search for: "State v. Comes"
Results 641 - 660
of 49,162
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Supreme Court Will Decide Burden Of Proof In FLSA Exemption Cases: A Monumental Decision On The Way!
27 Jun 2024, 6:15 am
Sales Inc. et al. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:33 am
Salinas v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:57 pm
Vullo, which addressed similar indirect coercion by New York state officials. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:55 pm
NRA v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:01 pm
Vullo decision, where it held that the NRA had stated a claim for impermissible censorship due to government jawboning. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 1:52 pm
In March, in Lindke v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:29 am
Delman v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:06 am
United States and Idaho v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 9:27 am
In Sparf v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:16 am
They would transform how the United States deals with people already living in the country — both lawfully and unlawfully — and also remake the policy governing people coming to the country, both directly from abroad and at the border. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 5:23 am
In State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:32 am
One way to get around spending 10 years in the US to overcome 212(a)(9)(B) inadmissibility is if the applicant is eligible for a waiver under INA §212(a)(b)(b)(v), which is based on a showing of extreme hardship to a qualifying relative such as a spouse or parent is a US citizen or lawful permanent resident. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
This post comes to us from Sullivan & Cromwell LLP. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:20 pm
To date, the UN system has not developed sufficient structures or tools to further reinforce implementation support, including systematic data gathering, wide-ranging capacity-building, or a global “help desk” for businesses, States, civil society and other stakeholders. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 3:07 pm
But five justices had rejected that theory in Williams v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 1:59 pm
The Court ducked the issue, but it will come back. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 12:33 pm
OKPLAC, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 12:22 pm
I was glad to see that the California Court of Appeal published its opinion in Luo v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 12:00 pm
The court says Coursera’s process provided reasonable notice to the plaintiff: the language in the email is reasonably conspicuous because the header clearly states that the email included updates to the TOU, the TOU hyperlink is in blue font and stands out from the remaining text, and the hyperlink is followed by a description of the TOU which specifically calls out “[u]pdated arbitration language. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 7:36 am
(Kimberly Wehle, Politico) The Supreme Court’s Dubious Use of History in Department of State v. [read post]