Search for: "State v. Comes" Results 641 - 660 of 49,162
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2024, 2:57 pm by Ilya Somin
Vullo, which addressed similar indirect coercion by New York state officials. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:01 pm by Eric Goldman
Vullo decision, where it held that the NRA had stated a claim for impermissible censorship due to government jawboning. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:16 am by Ahilan Arulanantham
They would transform how the United States deals with people already living in the country — both lawfully and unlawfully — and also remake the policy governing people coming to the country, both directly from abroad and at the border. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:32 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
One way to get around spending 10 years in the US to overcome 212(a)(9)(B) inadmissibility is if the applicant is eligible for a waiver under INA §212(a)(b)(b)(v), which is based on a showing of extreme hardship to a qualifying relative such as a spouse or parent is a US citizen or lawful permanent resident. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:20 pm
To date, the UN system has not developed sufficient structures or tools to further reinforce implementation support, including systematic data gathering, wide-ranging capacity-building, or a global “help desk” for businesses, States, civil society and other stakeholders. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 12:22 pm by Eugene Volokh
I was glad to see that the California Court of Appeal published its opinion in Luo v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 12:00 pm by Eric Goldman
The court says Coursera’s process provided reasonable notice to the plaintiff: the language in the email is reasonably conspicuous because the header clearly states that the email included updates to the TOU, the TOU hyperlink is in blue font and stands out from the remaining text, and the hyperlink is followed by a description of the TOU which specifically calls out “[u]pdated arbitration language. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 7:36 am by Ellena Erskine
(Kimberly Wehle, Politico) The Supreme Court’s Dubious Use of History in Department of State v. [read post]