Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 641 - 660 of 4,048
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2013, 5:46 pm
Weston Houck of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Charleston Division, ordered that the trademark infringement and declaratory relief action -- originally brought in State court by Bishop Mark Lawrence's Diocese and its parishes, but "removed" to federal court by the Episcopal Church in South Carolina -- be returned to State court for further adjudication. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 9:52 am by Walt Williams
  Additionally, the Court of Appeals held that the nurse’s actions were not foreseeable. [read post]
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 11:38 am by Poppy Weston-Davies, Olswang LLP
Issues before the Supreme Court The issues that were before the Court of Appeal will now be considered by the Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 10:28 am by Douglas Reiser
Well, the Division 1 Court of Appeals finally got the chance to discuss the boundaries of this summary proceeding, in a recent case. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 4:10 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a case addressing important issues affecting local agencies and landowners (disclaimer:  I represented the County of Napa in the trial court and on appeal), the First District (Division 4) Court of Appeal on April 20, 2012 filed its published opinion affirming a judgment upholding the County’s clarifying lot line adjustment ordinance (Ord. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
This past June saw a flurry of Confrontation Clause cases from the appellate division: State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Blue Shield of California, 189 Cal.App.4th 1117 (Nov. 5, 2010), the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division One) stated without analysis that a UCL "fraudulent" prong claim predicated on an omission (as opposed to an affirmative misrepresentation) does not lie absent a duty to disclose. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 9:13 am by Scott R. Sleight
Bridges Investment Group, LLC, the Division I Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's award of $376,469.41 in attorneys' fees. [read post]