Search for: "State v. Dean"
Results 641 - 660
of 2,910
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
The General Perjury Statute (18 USC 1621) has been nicely encapsulated in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 9:32 am
Smith, Dean of Libraries at the University of Kansas On March 23, 2020, the Supreme Court announced a decision in one of the three copyright cases before it this term, Allen v. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 6:56 am
It does not state that the difference is "the" SUM payment that is to be given to plaintiff, but rather it states that the difference is the "maximum" payment, which the average insured would understand to mean that it could be further reduced (see generally Dean, 19 NY3d at 708). [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 1:49 pm
In Life Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:30 am
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in Wiesmueller v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 12:00 am
In Perez v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 12:02 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
For example, in the seminal case of United States v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 7:20 am
Daly Professor of Law and the Associate Dean for Faculty Scholarship at St. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
Dean’s series on Republican Party obstructionism. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 4:48 pm
In Awad v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:26 pm
Bell v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 8:23 am
United States, 131 S.Ct. 704, 713 (2011). [read post]
20 May 2021, 9:01 pm
In the famous footnote 4 of United States v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 9:10 pm
The Supreme Court first recognized diversity in higher education as a "compelling" state interest in the 1978 ruling Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 12:56 pm
Dean, 604 F.3d 1275, ---- - ----, 2010 WL 1687618 *3-*8 (C.A.11 2010) (finding no APA violation); United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:48 pm
Author: Bill Pizzi, emeritus University of Colorado Law SchoolAbortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:30 pm
Bingham of Ohio and the Historical Context of the Fourteenth Amendment" Cynthia Nicoletti (Assistant Professor of Law, Mississippi College School of Law) "The Disputed Constitutionality of the Emancipation Proclamation"11:00-12:30 | Panel TwoStephen Mihm (University of Georgia), chairPaul Kens (Professor of Political Science, Texas State University at San Marcos) "Big Business and the Reconstruction Amendments: Lessons from Munn v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 1:55 am
Assume that any amendments you propose would be passed by Congress and ratified by the States on the strength of your persuasive skills as President. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 6:00 pm
Presumably, he would disagree with the determination in CA v. [read post]
