Search for: "State v. Flowers"
Results 641 - 660
of 841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
In lieu of flowers, the family asks that donations be made to the Marine Corps Scholarship Foundation and the Injured Marine Semper Fi Fund. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:39 am
(Guerrilha do Araguaia) v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 4:42 am
Society is not obliged to adopt the sensitivities of the most delicate flower among us. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:56 am
In Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:21 pm
GermanyBILD v. [read post]
13 Aug 2023, 12:43 pm
See Hess v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 10:43 am
App. 3d 735, 586 N.E.2d 679 (1991); see also State v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:45 pm
The justices once again did not act, however, on the petition for rehearing filed by Washington state florist Barronnelle Stutzman, who declined to make custom flower arrangements for a same-sex wedding because of her religious beliefs. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:28 pm
“This is one more attempt to erase the history of the peoples of the former Soviet Union, including the heroic history, from historical memory,” Prime Minister Vladimir V. [read post]
9 May 2019, 1:00 pm
In Tracy v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:45 am
Supreme Court’s Wayfair v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
In finding that the mark consisted of the shape that gave the product substantial value, the CJEU stated that this concept was not limited to the shape of products having only artistic or ornamental value and that it also covered products with “essential functional characteristics”. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
: Catnic Components Ltd & Anor v Hill and Smith Ltd (Spicy IP) United States US Patents BPAI rules for ex parte appeals: Request for comment and notice of roundtable (Patently-O) Bilski and Warsaw share insights (AwakenIP) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) You say tomato... [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
We've seen twice before what happens when plaintiffs start to get squeezed by preemption - during the initial flowering of the preemption defense in medical device cases that was snuffed out by Medtronic v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 1:52 pm
The photo showed her holding a vase of flowers covering her face while she was walking in NYC. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 12:04 pm
This is essentially the issue that the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) had to address in Sekmadienis v Lithuania (Appl No 69317/14). [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 9:17 am
Coast Guard when the vessel is within the waters of the United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 9:17 am
Coast Guard when the vessel is within the waters of the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am
” At Medium, Nick Lum points out that the South Dakota attorney general, who represented the state in South Dakota v. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 6:57 am
Many cannabis companies are closely watching the outcome of Gorilla Glue Co. v. [read post]
