Search for: "State v. Garcia" Results 641 - 660 of 1,445
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2020, 6:03 am by John Bellinger, Sean Mirski
Several defendants have argued strenuously that the Title III cases against them must be dismissed either because the plaintiffs do not have standing, or because the plaintiffs had failed to properly allege that the defendant companies had the necessary scienter or mental state. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 5:24 pm by Don Cruse
How much evidence is needed to establish attorneys fees as a sanction for failing to file a medical-malpractice expert report Samuel Garcia Jr., M.D. v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:13 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Pandora Media Ninth Circuit Rejects Video Privacy Protection Act Claims Against Sony AARP Defeats Lawsuit for Sharing Information With Facebook and Adobe Lawsuit Fails Over Ridesharing Service’s Disclosures To Its Analytics Service–Garcia v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
JUANITA PEREZ, VIRGINIA GARCIA, PAUL ZAPATA, AND SYLVIA SANCHEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ALL HEIRS OF ELISA ZAPATA, DECEASED; from Bexar County; 4th Court of Appeals District (04-13-00111-CV,406 SW3d 313, 06-26-13) 13-0576 THE WILLIAMSBURG CARE COMPANY, L.P. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:29 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Briefly: At this blog, David Garcia and Leo Caseria report on last week’s oral arguments in American Express v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
The floor goes to Katfriend Tove Graulund.* Lego 3D manikin mark valid, says General CourtJeremy reports on Case T‑395/14 Best-Lock (Europe) Ltd v OHIM, Lego Juris A/S, a General Court of the European Union decision regarding the validity of a Lego Community trade mark that will be familiar to many readers who are children, have children or are movie buffs: the three-dimensional shape of a little Lego man.* Swiss cheese, Innocence and a question of guilt:… [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:52 am by Sheppard Mullin
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 5:00 am by Philip Thomas
NMC reported last week on the Order issued by Northern District federal court Judge Mills in the Maggette v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 1:02 pm
  It is not disputed that he correctly stated the applicable law:   [255]       In  Garcia v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 3:36 am by Edith Roberts
At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps looks at the story behind a state constitutional provision relied on by Montana in Espinoza v. [read post]