Search for: "State v. Heard"
Results 641 - 660
of 18,925
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2009, 11:46 am
State v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 6:45 am
On Monday the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of Murr v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 6:41 am
The court heard argument in: Yellen v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 2:52 pm
That decision arrived on August 17, 2011 and the collective groans of plaintiff's attorneys could be heard across the state. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 7:47 am
The post Trademark Butter Battle: Kerrygold v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 3:31 am
In Harris v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 8:03 am
(As an example, consider State v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 6:17 am
In Walker v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:08 pm
In Sheriff v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:09 am
In Setser v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 5:58 am
In the first case, Byrd v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:31 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] heard oral arguments [day call, PDF] Wednesday in Vasquez v. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
On Tuesday, the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, heard oral arguments (audio or full oral arguments) in United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 8:23 am
In State v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am
They argued that this was the necessary implication of the finding of the Supreme Court in the case of Munir v Secretary of State [2012] 1 WLR 2192 and Alvi (which were heard together) that the power of the Secretary of State to make or vary the Immigration Rules was wholly statutory and not an exercise of prerogative power: [27]. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 10:31 am
The issue of municipal regulation of medical marijuana in California is set to be heard by the state's Supreme Court in the coming months. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 1:47 pm
On Thursday, the Nevada Supreme Court heard oral argument in Brede v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:29 am
“Our concern isn’t the overriding purpose of the policy, our concern is the overriding purpose of the Constitution…” Justice French On April 6, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 9:07 am
Although federal law normally requires such claims to be heard by a three-judge federal court, a single judge dismissed the suit for failure to state a claim, and the U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 1:23 pm
On January 20, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments inSturgeon v. [read post]
