Search for: "State v. Heard" Results 641 - 660 of 17,224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2008, 1:29 pm
That was the issue yesterday as the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Chambers v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 2:50 pm by Dwight Sullivan
On Monday, NMCCA heard oral argument on the defense’s fourth motion for enlargement of time in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 12:18 pm
Heard before the United States District Court, Northern District of Georgia was case number 1:10-cv-1612-TCB. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm by Blog Editorial
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 17 March 2011. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 5:01 am
The Court noted that such cases were distinguishable from the case at hand, since most involved hearings to determine whether an indigent defendant was entitled to payment by the state for expert psychiatric testimony, but did not decide the issue, since the case at hand was resolved on other grounds.To be appealable, an order or judgment must ordinarily be final. [read post]
By Kiran Jassal The Supreme Court of the United States recently heard oral arguments for Lee v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:33 am by Joanne Zimolzak
The US Supreme Court heard oral argument in the AEP v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 3:27 am by Autumn Callan
The US Supreme Court [official website] heard arguments on Tuesday for two cases, United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 2:50 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website, JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments [day call, PDF] Monday in Davis v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm by Blog Editorial
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 17 March 2011. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 11:41 am by David A. Newman
In February the U.S Supreme Court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am by Alison Macdonald, Matrix
On 12-13 November, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Kerr, Dyson, Hughes and Hodge) heard the case of Beghal v Director of Public Prosecutions, a challenge to the broad power of detention contained in Schedule 7 to the Terrorism Act 2000. [read post]