Search for: "State v. High" Results 641 - 660 of 32,069
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2018, 8:22 am by Dennis Crouch
Prior to the enactment of the 1952 Act, the only authority speaking on whether U.S. patent laws apply to U.S-flagged ships on the high seas was Gardiner v. [read post]
The High Court in sustaining the plaintiff’s submissions reopened and overruled its own precedent set out within Dickenson’s Arcade Pty Ltd v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:52 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Oceanbulk Shipping & Trading SA v TMT Asia Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 79 (15 February 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor [2010] EWHC 206 (Admin) (15 February 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) Stream Healthcare (London) Ltd v Pitman Education and Training Ltd [2010] EWHC 216 (Ch) (15 February 2010) Rolfe… [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
One notable consequence of high state cigarette excise tax rates has been increased smuggling as people procure discounted packs from low-tax states and sell them in high-tax states. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 4:12 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Dobbs, State Health Officer of the Mississippi Department of Health v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:37 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Gutermann Messtechnik & Anor v Hartley & Anor [2012] EWHC 1013 (QB) (19 April 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) HA (Nigeria)), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 979 (Admin) (17 April 2012) Wilby v The Municipal Court Prague Czech Republic [2012] EWHC 1006 (Admin) (19 April 2012) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 1:31 pm
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) RL & Anor, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 1970 (28 August 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) Mohamed, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs [2008] EWHC 2100 (Admin) (29 August 2008) High Court (Patents Court) Zipher Ltd v Markem Systems Ltd & Anor [2008] EWHC 2078 (Pat) (01 September 2008) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:28 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Baxendale- Walker v Middleton & Ors [2011] EWHC 998 (QB) (18 April 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) NXT, R (on the application of) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 969 (Admin) (15 April 2011) Puri, R (on the application of) v Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2011] EWHC 970 (Admin) (15 April 2011) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:49 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) LW (China) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 519 (24 April 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Hallam Estates Ltd & Anor v Baker [2012] EWHC 1046 (QB) (24 April 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Raeside, R (on the application of) v Crown Prosecution Service [2012] EWHC 1064 (Admin) (23 April 2012) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 6:31 am by Sarthak Gupta
Last year in June 2020, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights [‘the Court’] delivered its landmark judgement in the case of Paola Guzmán Albarracín v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 5:48 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Secretary of State for Work & Pensions v Lassal [2009] EWCA Civ 157 (10 March 2009) HJ (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 172 (10 March 2009) Furmans Electrical Contractors v Elecref Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 170 (10 March 2009) High Court (Chancery Division) University of Cambridge v Revenue [...] [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 3:59 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Divsion) Bracknell Forest Borough Council v Green & Anor [2009] EWCA Civ 238 (20 March 2009) Lambert v Clayton [2009] EWCA Civ 237 (20 March 2009) High Court (Administrative Court) Bailey & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWHC 562 (Admin) (20 March 2009) Secretary of State for the Home Department v [...] [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:33 am by Steven Boutwell
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued perhaps the most significant and far-reaching decision affecting state sales and use tax collection since its Quill v. [read post]