Search for: "State v. Hodge"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,257
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2017, 1:47 pm
He contends that he stated the gist of a meritorious claim that his appellate counsel was ineffective for not arguing that the State knowingly used false or misleading testimony to obtain the indictment. . . .People v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Kansas (1887) and was the lone dissenter in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 3:39 am
As every schoolboy knows, the sentencing reforms contained in the 1996 revisions to the criminal code were pretty much trashed in State v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 2:34 am
The panel consisted of Lady Hale and Lords Clarke, Wilson, Carnwath and Hodge. [read post]
17 May 2018, 9:00 pm
Hodges, which built on the Windsor decision. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 6:08 am
Hodges). [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 5:43 am
Hodges, the opinion that legalized gay marriage, and national security. [read post]
8 May 2022, 9:08 pm
Hodges, which protects the right to gay marriage. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 12:14 pm
In Hodges v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 8:21 am
The recently decided Sixth Circuit case of Howell v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Suisi v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:35 am
The Lord Advocate states he will address alternatives. [read post]
25 May 2017, 4:10 am
Hodges doesn’t require the state to list both married same-sex parents on their child’s birth certificate,” although “[s]tate law requires that both married opposite-sex parents be listed. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 12:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 9:15 am
Obergefell v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 6:48 am
United States (2014). 5. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am
As was said in Salvesen v Riddell 2013 SC (UKSC) 236 (Lord Hope at para 57), if such an order is made, it may be appropriate to give permission to the Lord Advocate to return to the court for any further orders under section 102(2)(b) as may be required. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 9:04 pm
Hodges, the state court asked the two groups and two probate judges directly involved in the case for their views on the effect of the Supreme Court decision on the state court’s earlier action. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 1:45 am
Lord Reed and Lord Hodge gave the main judgment, with which Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Hamblen agreed. [read post]
9 May 2016, 12:05 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
