Search for: "State v. Kent" Results 641 - 660 of 1,638
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2013, 5:58 am by Amy Howe
  And at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger dubs November 5 “federalism day” at the Court and discusses the role of the states in that day’s cases:  Bond v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:44 am
“It's a list of aspirations,” said Richard Gonzalez, a professor at Chicago-Kent College of Law who is working on the case pro bono.So Bees isn't her real name, and a law professor takes the case pro bono. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Petty, Accommodating 'Religion', (Tennessee Law Review, Forthcoming).Mohammad Fadel, Religious Law, Family Law and Arbitration: Shari'a and Halakha in America, (Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 90, No. 1, 2015).Marie Ashe, Hosanna-Tabor, the Ministerial Exemption, and Losses of Equality: Constitutional Law and Religious Privilege in the US, (2 Oxford Journal of Law and Religion (2015)).Adam Lamparello, Why Chief Justice Roy Moore and the Alabama Supreme Court Just Made the Case… [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 7:03 am by Larry
A way to carry a toddler up the col.If they wanted to bring the kids along for the ride, they could opt for the WeeRide Kangaroo Center-Mounted Bicycle-Child Carrier.From WeeRide.comThis video shows the WeeRide in action and makes me think I did parenting all wrong:Which brings me to Kent International, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Lund. 87 Chicago-Kent Law Review 707-897 (2012). [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:46 am by Amy Howe
  Kent Scheidegger reports at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
The justices also sent United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:50 pm
Kent Scheidegger’s comments for Crime & Consequences can be accessed here. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 11:32 am by John McFarland
This week, the Texas Supreme Court denied Denbury Green Pipeline's motion for rehearing in Texas Rice Land Partners v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:49 am by familoo
Sadly, the Great Wheeze that was Q v Q is no more. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 6:26 pm
Supreme court case of Caulder -v- Bull 3 U.S. 386 (1798) which states:"I will state what laws I consider ex post facto laws, within the words and the intent of the prohibition. 1st. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 10:03 am
Kent (06-1498) — federal preemption of state law-based claim of fraud on a federal agency regarding drug approval Tues., Feb. 26: Allison Engine Co. v. [read post]