Search for: "State v. Kong" Results 641 - 660 of 871
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2012, 5:56 am by Zoe Tillman
Cardona has been seeking a pardon that would allow him to return to the United States from Mexico. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
Latin American and Caribbean activists have brought cases to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, and the first case of sexual orientation discrimination, Atala v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:00 am by Gmlevine
Isaac Goldstein, D2010-0279 (WIPO May 7, 2010) (Parties in the United States and Hong Kong). [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:33 am by SHG
 The corporation was based on Hong Kong. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:44 am by admin
They base their conclusion on the landmark 1922 Supreme Court decision in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by IP Dragon
 Hong Kong amended its Patent Ordinance, June 27, 1997 and on February 22, 2008. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 12:53 pm by admin
  In October, 2011, the federal CRTC announced that, together with the Australian Communications and Media Authority, it has assembled 12 enforcement agencies to form an international do-not-call network (Australia, Canada, France, Hong Kong, Ireland, Israel, Korea, Mexico, New Zealand, Spain, the UK and the United States). [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 12:42 pm by Steve Szentesi
  In October, 2011, the federal CRTC announced that, together with the Australian Communications and Media Authority, it has assembled 12 enforcement agencies to form an international do-not-call network (Australia, Canada, France, Hong Kong, Ireland, Israel, Korea, Mexico, New Zealand, Spain, the UK and the United States). [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:21 am
In the United Kingdom and other Council of Europe member states, following the 1981 decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Dudgeon v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 3:40 am
" This morning the Court of Justice gave its ruling in Joined Cases C 446/09 Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Lucheng Meijing Industrial Company Ltd, Far East Sourcing Ltd, Röhlig Hong Kong Ltd, Röhlig Belgium NV and Nokia Corporation and and C 495/09 Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Revenue and Customs, International Trademark Association intervening. [read post]