Search for: "State v. Lang"
Results 641 - 660
of 771
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
This would appear to be a strange result (and goes against eg Case T-152/07 Lange Uren v OHIM). [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
The Forensics of Verbal Fillers Broadly stated, speakers tend to use the verbal fillers uh and um when something has interrupted the enormously complicated task of speech production. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
In the middle are a small group of academic theorists who see value and resilience in the state but understand that the ideological pretensions of the Westphalian system have become unrealistic in a world now ordered through governance frameworks of a number of actors only some of which are states. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:21 am
Mr Duan agreed and noted that the anti-suit injunctions are also hardly enforceable, and merely act to put companies into uncertainty and dilemma with the national courts – there are few cases where they have actually been enforced. [1] Unwired Planet International Ltd v Huawei Technologies Co Ltd and others [2020] UKSC 37 [2] Optis Cellular Technology, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:21 am
Mr Duan agreed and noted that the anti-suit injunctions are also hardly enforceable, and merely act to put companies into uncertainty and dilemma with the national courts – there are few cases where they have actually been enforced. [1] Unwired Planet International Ltd v Huawei Technologies Co Ltd and others [2020] UKSC 37 [2] Optis Cellular Technology, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 11:51 pm
Lee Pharma v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am
Or that the credibility of the technical effect is assessed at the priority or filing date (e.g., TGI Paris, October 6, 2009, RG n°07/16446, Teva v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 12:29 am
Nativa v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 11:18 am
Furthermore, the PDP Project proposal must now include information on “intellectual property, exclusivity contracts or commercial agreements, including details of any agreements or restrictions on licensing or 3rd-party access to the technology” (Annex CX, article 8, V). [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:31 pm
Lange v ABC and Gardiner v Durie do not get a mention. [read post]
19 May 2015, 4:49 am
Quintanilla v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 3:54 pm
Lawdiva aka Georgialee Lang [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:28 am
In its latest decision on this topic, Amgen Inc. et al. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 4:44 am
This policy was based on Peranzo et al. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:07 pm
Rewriting the history of the DSM Directive – Part 1 by Julia Reda “EU Member States are currently grappling with the task of implementing the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (DSM Directive) into national law. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 11:30 am
Rossmiller also analyzes the underlying Jones v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:26 pm
All of this is true, but in JN v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:08 am
For example, in Rosalba Alassini v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 11:35 am
Lawdiva aka Georgialee Lang [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:36 am
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg) and C-559/20 (Koch Media GmbH v. [read post]
