Search for: "State v. Levell"
Results 641 - 660
of 29,658
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2018, 10:50 am
National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 2:06 am
In Christopher Simmons v Derek Castle [2012] EWCA Civ 1288, the Court of Appeal amended the guidance given in the earlier judgment of Simmons v Castle [2012] EWCA Civ 1039 by stating that, with effect from 1 April 2013, the proper level of general damages in all civil claims for six specified heads of loss will be 10% higher than previously, unless the claimant falls within section 44(6) of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (the… [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 12:26 pm
Accordingly, the Court accurately explained in Presser v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 7:03 pm
The Court first finds that the State violated Batson v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:00 am
§ 13.4 Level of Proof Necessary (More Probable Than Not) The Case: Bara v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:11 pm
First American Title Insurance Company 14-106 Issue: Whether federal due process requires state-court judges, in reviewing jury-awarded punitive damages for constitutional excessiveness, to: (1) use de novo review to set punitive damages at the level they find appropriate, without viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, based on Cooper Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 5:26 am
Last month, in Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 10:18 am
On 12 July 2016 the Supreme Court heard the appeal of Moreno v The Motor Insurers’ Bureau. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 11:42 am
In Suarez v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 10:45 am
The recent United States Supreme Court decision in the case of United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
In the case of R (P, G and W) and Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor [2019] UKSC 3 the Supreme Court upheld challenges to the legal regimes for disclosing criminal records in England and Wales, and Northern Ireland, finding them to be incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”). [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:50 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
NARA v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Advocates for same-sex marriage had achieved only one state-level victory prior to Goodridge. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 12:50 pm
It’s nothing like an instance in which one State is complaining that another State has dumped sewage into a body of water that’s crossed the border.Justice Kagan is correct that, in Mass v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 8:39 am
Prometheus Labs. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:42 am
State v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 6:47 am
Miller v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 4:47 am
A union is not required to carry every grievance to the highest level to satisfy its duty of fair representationDelsante v CSEA Local 1000, AFSCME AFL-CIO, 2010 NY Slip Op 51145(U), decided on June 15, 2010, Supreme Court, Richmond County, Judge Judith N. [read post]
