Search for: "State v. Maker" Results 641 - 660 of 4,661
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2021, 3:59 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Permission to appeal to the Supreme Court was granted on the two questions stated above. [read post]
Meade J has also stated that any decision the court makes on the FRAND royalty amount the iPhone maker must pay would apply worldwide, not just to its UK sales (in line with the UK Supreme Court decision last year in Unwired Planet v Huawei). [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
-boycotted Caribbean island nation into the select group of the United States, Germany and Russia that produce vaccines with efficacy of more than 90% - Novavax, Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna and Sputnik V. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:15 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
First, discrimination may arise where the state fails to treat differently people whose situations are significantly different. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 11:59 am by Jason Rantanen
  The Genius of Shepard’s I am pretty sure that every law student in the United States still learns to use the venerable Shepard’s citation system. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:58 am by Cyberleagle
Although even the CJEU must allow for some differences in Member State domestic laws, it is in principle able to be more pre [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm by José Carlos Laguna de Paz
Judges are not decision-makers, so they cannot substitute their own judgment for that of the agency. [read post]
InterDigital v Xiaomi (2020-21) In July 2020, the US tech company InterDigital filed suit against the Chinese consumer electronics maker Xiaomi, claiming infringement of its 3G and 4G patents, as the latter had used its technology without authorisation. [read post]