Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 641 - 660
of 19,464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2007, 7:55 am
After all, we don't want to let the other side in on it… But here's what I can tell you: In what marked the first of several Supreme Court Moot Advocacy Courts of the year, Andy Rossman HLS '92, a partner at Akin Gump, stood in front of dozens of HLS students and rehearsed his defense of the constitutionality of the New York State convention system as questioned in New York State Board of Elections v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 2:50 am
Christian Dior Couture, S.A. v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:42 pm
Mark J. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 5:52 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 2:03 am
In particular, Kitchin LJ in Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp [2017] EWCA Civ 1834 considered a number of rulings of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the context of ‘targeting’ towards specific Member States. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 6:22 am
by Matt Borick The arrival of October marks an historic milestone for password privacy law. [read post]
31 May 2008, 8:11 pm
In June, we will be marking the fifth anniversary of the U.S. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 1:44 pm
According to Han Beauty Inc v Alberto-Culver Co., 236 F.3d 1333, (Fed. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 6:47 am
In Marks v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 4:11 pm
This word, mark or symbol is a trademark or service mark eligible for state or federal trademark registration. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 4:13 am
Lexmark responds that it is not subject to false marking liability in part because it includes a disclaimer stating that the product is covered by one or more of the listed patents. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:15 am
In Iancu v. [read post]
10 Apr 2025, 6:19 am
An Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals panel upheld a preliminary injunction barring the use of the “KRANK3D” mark, in a case brought by a company that holds the registered trademark “KRANK’D” (Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:33 am
In, DC Comics v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:30 am
See, e.g., Signal Cos. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 8:30 am
A great source to find out about the type of marks that are registerable in each Member State is the Member Profile online tool. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 7:18 am
The ruling in Riggs v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:12 am
The Board of Appeal of the EUIPO confirmed the rejection of the sound and stated in its reasoning that the sign was not 'catchy' enough to stand out from the already existing jingles and did not fulfil the origin function of a trade mark. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 2:00 pm
The trial of Mark Jensen in State of Wisconsin -v- Mark D. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:20 pm
., with oral argument in Kahler v. [read post]
