Search for: "State v. Nails"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,045
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2012, 8:00 pm
The case is Bacote, et al v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:21 am
" Martin Oliver v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:56 am
“strength in weakness” is an overly simplistic explanation: Judith embodies (in political terms) “the people v. tyranny”, (in feminist terms) ”righteous woman vs. marauding man” and (in County Music terms) “git-er done gal v. skunk-drunk asshole. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 9:30 am
§§636(b)(1)(A)–(B); United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 3:39 pm
" citing People v Baskerville, 60 NY2d 374, 382 (1983) and referencing People v Jackson, 2 AD3d 893, 896 (2003), lv denied 1 NY3d 629 (2004). [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:34 am
Historically, conventional wisdom held that criminal street gangs primarily sought to nail down turf in their hometown for retail drug sales and sometimes extortion, tagging neighborhoods to mark their territory, etc.. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:31 am
To take your own look at the 11th Circuit’s opinion in SEC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
Brazilian Blowout revised its position stating their products contained less than 0.2 percent formaldehyde, levels deemed safe for cosmetic use—a statement in line with the 2005 formaldehyde evaluation.) [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
Brazilian Blowout revised its position stating their products contained less than 0.2 percent formaldehyde, levels deemed safe for cosmetic use—a statement in line with the 2005 formaldehyde evaluation.) [read post]
31 May 2012, 4:24 am
” Estate of Frankl v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:07 pm
Under a judgment entered in Solis v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 8:20 am
Last Thursday, after seven years of coursing through various boards of appeals and courts in Europe, the Court of Justice for the European Union (CJEU) held in their robust judgment in Rubinstein and L'Oreal v OHIM (Case C-100/11) that the General Court did not err in law in concluding that L'Oreal's mark for BOTOCYL and Helena Rubinstein's mark for BOTOLIST took advantage of the distinctive character and reputation of… [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:54 am
Ashley: Costco v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 7:26 pm
In People v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:11 pm
DauscherToday, in Kirby v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:00 am
Additionally, its hard to see where a case like this fits within juvenile 8th Amendment cases such as Roper v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:15 am
What the American people want is an economy that doesn’t feel like the United States of Quicksand. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:22 pm
” But while I was biting my nails and worrying about this post, I began to reread Henry V and realized that the action in the play actually commences with a lengthy speech on Salic law and Henry’s right to the throne of France. [read post]
The Dangers Involved in New York Construction Site Accidents Discussed in Ruscilli v. Indus. Comm'n.
24 Apr 2012, 3:40 pm
Co., Inc., v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:31 pm
RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. [read post]
