Search for: "State v. Pardon" Results 641 - 660 of 851
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Neither of the contracting parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens under the stipulations of this convention, but the executive authority of each shall have the power to deliver them up, if, in its discretion, it be deemed proper to do so. [read post]
25 May 2011, 3:08 am by Adam Wagner
In Shepherd Masimba Kambadzi v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 23 the court held by a majority that a foreign national prisoner’s detention was unlawful for the periods in respect of which no review was carried out, contrary to Home Office policy, and that he does have a claim in tort for false imprisonment in respect of those periods. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V The contracting Parties shall not be bound to delivery up their own citizens or subjects under the stipulations of this treaty. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
In the event that extradition is denied on that basis, Article 3(2) requires the Requested State to submit the case to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution if the Requesting State so requests and if the laws of the Requested State so allow. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The State applied to, or Courts of such State, shall decide whether the crime or offense is of a political character. [read post]
15 May 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
R(Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice presented the UK Supreme Court with the question of whether compensation for miscarriage of justice should only be payable to someone was subsequently shown conclusively to have been innocent of the offence, or whether it should be open to anyone whose conviction has been declared unsafe. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 20 provides that the requested State shall represent the requesting State in an proceedings in the requested State arising out of a request for extradition. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on February 25, 1935. [read post]
6 May 2011, 11:47 am by Rhead Enion
The environmental plaintiffs rely on United States v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V If the person claimed is under prosecution, either in the United States or Haiti, for any other crime than that upon which the demand for extradition is based, the extradition shall be postponed until the judgment is pronounced, and, if the person is convicted, until the sentence imposed is fully served or remitted. [read post]
2 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V A fugitive criminal shall not be surrendered under the provisions hereof, when, from lapse of time or other lawful cause, according to the laws of either of the surrendering or the demanding country, the criminal is exempt from prosecution or punishment for the offense for which the surrender is asked. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Neither of the contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens or subjects under the stipulations of this convention. [read post]