Search for: "State v. Parent"
Results 641 - 660
of 14,635
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
In Oklahoma Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 10:26 pm
That right might therefore be overridden by a state body, provided there was a sufficiently pressing need to do so for one of the purposes in Article 9(2) and the means used were both lawful and proportionate, applying the four-stage proportionality test in Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) (SC(E)) [2014] AC 700 [at 20] and allowing the state body an appropriate discretionary area of judgment. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
SeeEisner v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 7:17 pm
Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc., 770 F.2d 399, 407 (4th Cir. 1985) and United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 1:09 pm
” SEC v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 12:11 pm
The art never left the walls of the parents, but the ownership did. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 6:39 am
State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:36 pm
” Davidoff & Ors v (i) Dhir Doshi and (ii) Thomas Govan [Claim No. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 11:15 am
Steagald v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 11:54 am
As Justice Barrett explained in Biden v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
In Hosanna-Tabor v. [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 12:13 pm
Bureau of Wash., D.C. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm
To determine if procedures interfering with fundamental rights comply with Fourteenth Amendment due process rights, the court applies the Mathews v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 2:58 pm
L v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 10:42 am
Substantial State Interest As usual, the court credits the state’s interest in protecting children’s privacy and physical/psychological well-being. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 9:41 am
L., et al. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:00 am
Helms upheld a state statute that made it a criminal offense for a parent to willfully abandon their dependent child and leave the state. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 3:06 pm
In Galaviz, v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 1:11 pm
R.S.K. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 9:35 am
I’m not bound by the rules of evidence, I’m not bound by the rules of court, and, with certain exceptions concerning children’s parenting arrangements, I’m only bound to consider the statutory and common law of a jurisdiction if the parties agree that I will apply that law in making my decision. [read post]
