Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 641 - 660
of 29,593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2024, 2:05 pm
Section 1124 begins by stating that all claims included in a plan are impaired “unless . . . [read post]
24 May 2013, 4:00 am
Including proposed staffing changes in a plan to close schools submitted to the State Education Department does not cloak the staffing issues as a state policy, law or regulation thereby precluding submitting the matter to arbitration Board of Educ.of the City Sch. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 6:25 pm
A little more than one year ago, we reported on a settlement (Cassell et al. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:33 am
Attorneys who advise state elected officials need no crystal ball to see what an affirmance in Gill v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 6:11 am
Last week, a Washington state pharmacy filed a petition and an accompanying legal memorandum (full text) with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals seeking an en banc rehearing in Stormans Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 6:10 am
Most of these failures can be attributed to one of two causes; the financial collapse of the entity due to poor business planning and/or practices, or the lack of a defined plan of succession for key management personnel. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 11:47 am
Group Corp. v Planning Bd. of Town of Woodbury, N.Y., 20 AD3d at 533; Matter of Koncelik v Planning Bd. of Town of E. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 11:47 am
Group Corp. v Planning Bd. of Town of Woodbury, N.Y., 20 AD3d at 533; Matter of Koncelik v Planning Bd. of Town of E. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:03 pm
United States, 556 U.S.___ (2009) and Arizona v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:03 pm
For example, in the 1914 case Harris v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:27 pm
Tomorrow morning the Court will hear oral argument in No. 05-1448, Beck v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:28 am
Transfers relating to life insurance policies, however, are an exception to this exception.[6] Doubts about Your Capacity To make a valid gift, you must have the mental capacity required by state law, but those standards vary by state. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 11:40 am
Colvin, May 19, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit More Blog Entries: Mabry v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 12:00 am
In Acosta v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 2:47 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 3:42 pm
On August 17, 2016, the California Supreme Court ordered the Fourth District’s opinion in People for Proper Planning v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 8:20 am
RCHFU, LLC v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 8:20 am
RCHFU, LLC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 1:38 pm
" The Appeals Court said, "In order to exhaust administrative remedies, claims cannot be 'only vaguely and cryptically referred to, if at all, during the administrative appeal.' See Kleissler v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:19 am
Assuming that the northeastern states support the Clean Power Plan, it sets up a sort of "Blue v. [read post]
