Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 641 - 660
of 11,948
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2009, 7:56 am
Price J. examined this issue in Vokes Estate v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 3:01 pm
By allowing indirect purchasers who had no standing to sue under their state's antitrust laws to be part of the settlement class, the appellate majority has created a “come one, come all” environment that “sets the class action ship in [the Ninth] Circuit badly adrift,” the dissent argued.The decision is Sullivan v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 8:22 am
New York’s unique approach likely stems from Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 12:01 pm
In Golden Telecom, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 12:48 pm
That statute established the Northwest Power and Conservation Council (the Council), an interstate agency composed of state-appointed representatives from Idaho, Montana, Oregon, and Washington that Congress tasked with promulgating both "a regional conservation and electric power plan" and "a program to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife." 16 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 4:41 pm
See Price v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 1:01 pm
I would sacrifice to ensure such things grace our roads in flawless state. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 4:19 pm
Price v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 3:25 am
The respondent visited the appellant’s home on 28 Jul 2011 and there agreed a price. [read post]
16 May 2019, 12:15 pm
In APPLE INC. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 7:30 pm
Judicial Watch v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:56 am
In R v Briggs-Price the House held that if prosecutors wished to introduce alleged benefit from offences not proved at the trial they would have to do so to the criminal standard. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:09 pm
The Court’s decision in Trailboss Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:46 am
Naylor Group Inc. v Ellis-Don Construction Ltd., [1996] OJ No 3247, 31 CLR (2d) 195 (ON Gen Div), revd [1999] 119 OAC 182 (ONCA), vard 2001 SCC 58, [2001] 2 SCR 943, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2001/2001scc58/2001scc58.html This is not a tender dispute between an owner and a bidder, but between a general contractor and a subcontractor whose prices were used to secure a low bid. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 3:30 pm
Eurodif and United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 6:43 pm
Ronwin); and (3) a board controlled by attorneys prohibits attorney advertising and deters attorneys from engaging in price competition (Bates v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 6:43 pm
Ronwin); and (3) a board controlled by attorneys prohibits attorney advertising and deters attorneys from engaging in price competition (Bates v. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 6:47 pm
The payments the trustee did make were made in U.S. dollars, beneficiaries being resident in the United States. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 6:15 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
Loral Corp. v. [read post]
