Search for: "State v. Register" Results 641 - 660 of 13,688
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2023, 7:47 pm by Thomas James
OpenAI relies on the precedent set in Authors Guild v. [read post]
Fourth, as mentioned above, there are significant differences in the limitations of liability under the CLC v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Paul Miller, founding partner at Miller/Wenhold Capitol Strategies, takes issue with tying lobbyists to the Menendez case, which centers on alleged bribery by businesspeople who are not registered lobbyists. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Yesterday, a Press Communiqué was published as the Enlarged Board had issued its decision in consolidated cases G 1/22 and G 2/22 and the decision became available in the register, and today on the Recent Decisions page. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 1:10 pm by Unknown
The need for the holding period came into sharp focus, the association said, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Slack Technologies LLC v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 9:03 pm by Meredith Ervine
In March 2023, in the wake of the US Supreme Court decision in Slack Technologies v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 2:40 pm by Justia Team
Register for This Webinar All licensed United States lawyers are invited to attend Justia Webinars. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
On August 25, 2023, two SEC compliance and disclosure interpretations (“C&DI”) were issued related to these quarterly disclosures.[1] C&DI 133A.01 states that Item 408(a)(1) of Regulation S-K does not require disclosure of termination of a plan that ends due to expiration or completion of the plan in accordance with its terms, without any action by an individual. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
On August 25, 2023, two SEC compliance and disclosure interpretations (“C&DI”) were issued related to these quarterly disclosures.[1] C&DI 133A.01 states that Item 408(a)(1) of Regulation S-K does not require disclosure of termination of a plan that ends due to expiration or completion of the plan in accordance with its terms, without any action by an individual. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 6:46 pm by Kurt R. Karst
  Instead, DEA states: This extension authorizes all DEA-registered practitioners to prescribe schedule II–V controlled medications via telemedicine through December 31, 2024, whether or not the patient and practitioner established a telemedicine relationship on or before November 11, 2023. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 9:34 am by Marcel Pemsel
I.e. member states could delay the effectiveness of this provision to the year 2525 if they so desire. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Unknown
She stated that it represents a “mandate first, evaluate later” approach based on assumptions and speculation, and fails to fulfill certain fundamental functions of sound notice-and-comment rulemaking.Codifying exemptive letters. [read post]