Search for: "State v. Sellers"
Results 641 - 660
of 3,680
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2011, 7:58 am
The case is DeGennaro v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 8:42 am
As Justice Kagan stated: “This case is about dog toys and whiskey, two words seldom appearing in the same sentence. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am
The second part of the judgment then focused on whether such violation was justified by the unique qualities of the property in question, the peculiarities of its discovery, or the Italian State’s interest in preserving the integrity of its cultural patrimony. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 4:30 am
" The United States District Court for the District of Colorado was faced with just that question in the recently decided Zapien v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 5:55 am
In Steiner v. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 3:19 am
TaShae Watson v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 8:23 am
Such was the case in Hamilton v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 6:49 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 6:31 am
See, e.g., Anthony v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 10:07 pm
The re-seller should have some amount of leeway to use the trademark owner's mark in order to refer to the trademarked goods and in the re-seller's domain name, but the court's order doesn't cut the re-seller much slack. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 5:21 am
In Bowman v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 6:19 am
The Eastland Court of Appeals issued an opinion in 1999, in the case Chicago Title v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 12:35 pm
The case is Kransky v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 9:47 am
Introduced by Assemblyman Phil Steck on January 15, 2015 and by State Senator Andrew Lanza on March 20, 2015, the bill (A2147/S4447) is entitled “Policy Against Restraint of Trade,” and operates from the premise that the Court of Appeals decision in BDO Seidman v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 9:47 am
Introduced by Assemblyman Phil Steck on January 15, 2015 and by State Senator Andrew Lanza on March 20, 2015, the bill (A2147/S4447) is entitled “Policy Against Restraint of Trade,” and operates from the premise that the Court of Appeals decision in BDO Seidman v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:40 am
United States, No. 17-9082, Justice Samuel A. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:57 pm
Burns v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:41 am
It's All There in Black and White: The illustration at the outset of this post of course depicts the characters from the classic Spy v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 12:39 pm
On February 20, 2008, the Court unanimously affirmed the First Circuit decision in Rowe v. [read post]
