Search for: "State v. Stock"
Results 641 - 660
of 6,159
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2015, 3:47 am
The company stock is ‘short’ sold where a party makes money when the price of a stock goes down (here) and then an IPR is filed to bring the stock price down. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 12:07 pm
See generally United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 4:07 pm
The seminal case, SEC v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 10:33 am
By Anne Sherry, J.D.An investor in Textura Corporation stated a claim that the company fraudulently omitted disclosing its CEO's prior ties to criminal stock promoters, including the "Wolf of Wall Street," Jordan Belfort. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
In that regard, we are discussing the most recent Delaware decision on the subject, Zucker v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:55 am
When the curtain rose for oral argument in Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:49 pm
In Pfeiffer v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:50 am
California and in support of respondent Antoine Jones in United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 6:10 pm
The May 31, 2016 cert petition in the case of Fried v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 7:00 am
., v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 6:50 am
In Dudenhoefer v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 4:31 pm
If you have an interest in both ERISA and in well written, logical judicial opinions, I can’t recommend highly enough this opinion, by Judge Gertner of the United States District Court for Massachusetts, in Bendaoud v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 10:32 am
The Supreme Court’s holding in Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:54 am
In addition, a Satisfaction of Judgment was filed on February 24,2021 stating that the Judgment was paid in full and the sum of $0.00 remains unpaid (NYSCEF Doc. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 9:33 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 5:00 am
In addition to state standards and the requirements of SOX, the stock exchanges each have their own standards for independence. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 2:27 pm
(Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, March 19, 2021, Tetragon Financial Group Limited v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 3:30 am
Judge Seeherman's position on Section 2(e)(4) remains consistent with her concurrence in In re Joint-Stock Company "Baik", 84 USPQ2d 1921, 1924 (TTAB 2007), in stating that the purpose behind Section 2(e)(4) is to keep surnames available to those who wish to use their own names. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 5:37 pm
., in federal court alleging fraud, breach of contract, and several state-law claims. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:13 am
--Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia, Third DivisionOpinion Date: 3/29/10Cite: American Control Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
