Search for: "State v. Strickland" Results 641 - 660 of 869
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2019, 7:27 am by John Elwood
Texas, 18-9674  Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
Strickland Issue: Whether a racial minority group that constitutes less than 50% of a proposed district's population can state a vote dilution claim under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am by John Elwood
”  Coming to us from the Land of the State-on-Top Habeas Petition is Hoffner v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am by John Floyd
Wiggins: Standby counsel appointed by Court does not violate self-representation right. 1984 Strickland v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am by Matthew Bush
§ 2254(e)(1)’s command that an underlying state-court fact determination must be presumed correct; (2) whether the Sixth Circuit violated Section 2254(d)(1) of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) by granting habeas relief on a purportedly unreasonable application of state law; and (3) whether the Sixth Circuit violated AEDPA § 2254(d)(1) by asserting its own prejudice standard – that a defendant “must only show that he had a… [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 2:42 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Defendant cites the recent United States Supreme Court decision of Jose Padilla v Kentucky, 130 S. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 4:18 pm
The standards, set in 1984 in a case called Strickland v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:28 am by John Elwood
Alabama, 16-9282  Whether, when trial counsel does not testify about his or her own strategic decisions as part of a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 12:07 am
We're the government, and we're here to copy - Blueport Co. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:50 am by Aaron Tang
Franita Tolson –   In NAMUDNO v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:45 pm by Maureen Johnston
United States 13-983Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:12 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]