Search for: "Stephens v. State"
Results 641 - 660
of 7,067
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2022, 10:06 am
Lord Stephens, who gave the leading judgment (with which all members of the court agreed), considered the following: Ground 1: This argument was dismissed and Bilta was correctly applied to this case. [read post]
4 May 2022, 7:29 am
Dick Durbin (D., IL.) pressed him on whether Roe is “settled law,” Alito responded again by stating the obvious: Roe v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:25 am
Dzhabarov told the state-run RIA Novosti news agency Europe’s leaders “have gone a little crazy”. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:15 am
Stephen T. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:30 am
I highlight “national” because only one of the fifty American states allows similar full-life tenure. [read post]
3 May 2022, 4:30 am
In the balance of today's essay, I'll discuss a hypothesis first floated by Professor Stephen Vladeck and reported by the NY Times last month: perhaps the Biden administration is hoping that once the mandate expires of its own force (as it will tomorrow), the case will be moot; then, invoking the Munsingwear mootness doctrine (named for the 1950 SCOTUS case of United States v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:09 pm
Politico: “The Supreme Court has voted to strike down the landmark Roe v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:34 pm
In that case, Deck v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 9:51 am
Gorsuch criticized the Supreme Court’s 1971 decision in Lemon v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 7:54 am
Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
Luxshare Ltd. and AlixPartners LLP v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In Francis v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 2:14 pm
"Broumas v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:45 am
[Six decades ago, a young Stephen Breyer clerked for Justice Goldberg on a very, very different Supreme Court. ] Today the Supreme Court decided Cummings v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:45 am
Oklahoma v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 6:56 pm
Supreme Court has posted online the transcript and audio of today’s oral argument in Oklahoma v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 6:15 pm
Share“John the Tiger Man,” a hypothetical dangerous prisoner invented by Justice Stephen Breyer, featured prominently in Tuesday’s oral argument in Shoop v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 11:48 am
(These cases, including Ramirez v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 6:24 am
For information on this topic, contact Stephen Metz.The post Subchapter V Corner – Are Subchapter V Business Debtors at Risk to Fight Non-Dischargeability Creditor Complaints? [read post]
