Search for: "Stephens v. State Bar" Results 641 - 660 of 1,676
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2017, 10:23 am by Ronald Mann
I would not have been surprised if this little statutory case had been a letdown after the constitutional concerns with which the justices began their morning in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
That is the nature of pluralism in a democratic society but it tends to show that, on this topic (and in the words of Browne-Wilkinson V-C in Stephens), there is no “generally accepted code of sexual morality”. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:43 am by Amanda Frost
 First, collateral review of state convictions – that is, as the Supreme Court put it in 2011 in Wall v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 10:50 am by Philip Segal
The nightmare scenario is the famed Winnie the Pooh case in California, Stephen Schlesinger, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 8:04 am by Eugene Volokh
The defense bar and supportive organizations will surely bring test cases in other states. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 8:55 am by Amy Howe
The highest-profile grant of the day came in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
Stephen Vladeck and Julian Ku discuss the case in a Bloomberg Law podcast. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:34 am by Chris Seaton
Each case handled by Stephens’ office cost the state a whopping $313 dollars. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 7:46 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Other courts in other States seen to equate no-hire clauses with more restrictive covenants.The case is CMGRP, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:54 am by Rory Little
The pun seems inevitable: In Wednesday morning’s oral argument in Class v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 12:47 pm by Amy Howe
When the justices took the bench this morning to hear oral argument in District of Columbia v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 1:03 pm by Mark Walsh
Among those present from the other side of the case, defending Wisconsin’s map, are state Attorney General Brad Schimel, a Republican, and state Sen. [read post]