Search for: "Steve Branch"
Results 641 - 660
of 930
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2013, 7:36 am
” Steve Vladeck of LawFare praises Justice Thomas’s dissent from the denial of certiorari in Lanus v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
And because the NDAAs and the caselaw and executive-branch practice surrounding them are constantly evolving, we plan on releasing periodic updates to this book as events warrant. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 10:16 am
His stated reasoning for doing so makes little sense to me except through the lens of maximizing the prerogative of the executive branch. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 7:00 am
Meanwhile, in the latter case, Steve filed an amicus brief with the D.C. [read post]
8 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
Jack piped in on proposed re-writes to the 2001 AUMF, wondering whether there might actually be a consensus among the first and second branches of government on the need to rewrite the law. [read post]
8 Jun 2013, 7:23 am
"... to make sure that we’re abiding by the Constitution, due process, and rule of law, then we’re going to have some problems here," Obama said.Lawprof Steve Shiffrin (at the Religious Left Law blog) says: The problem is that federal judges ran away from the Constitution years ago on this very issue, and the President’s characterization of this program as a “modest encroachment” on privacy shows that he either lacks integrity or he has an impoverished… [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 5:24 pm
There is also an independent role to be played within the executive branch. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 11:06 am
One point of common ground in the debate at Lawfare over the continued viability of the AUMF (at least among Bobby and Matthew, Jen and Steve, and me – not sure about Ben) is that Congress should engage the Executive branch more on the application of the current AUMF. [read post]
28 May 2013, 7:15 am
- John Reinan, Senior Director, Media Relations, Fast Horse Steve Baird recently wrote about the use of real brand names on fictional products in entertainment. [read post]
16 May 2013, 8:55 am
If, however, you want to retain the option to blame the president and the executive branch, then you will have to give them the power to prevent those attacks. [read post]
9 May 2013, 2:13 pm
Steve Coll notes the parallel with Eisenhower in his New Yorker piece. [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:12 am
Steve has responded to my post on Harold Koh’s sudden discovery of inviolable commander in chief powers. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 7:44 am
Vogt of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; Inspector General Steve A. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:53 pm
By Gretchen Goetz and Helena Bottemiller By March of last year, lean finely textured beef (LFTB) had reached celebrity status under the unfavorable moniker “pink slime. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 6:43 pm
Harman, like Steve and Jennifer, voiced caution in having Congress adopt what she described as a “blanket authorization. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:24 pm
The question, rather, is whether you want the contours of this continuing armed conflict to be defined by the Executive Branch acting alone, or whether you want it defined by some joint action of the Executive Branch and Congress. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
Put in a more cynical way, I can imagine many federal judges thinking “we don’t exist to provide top cover to the Executive branch for difficult decisions; foist this responsibility on us and you diminish both our branches of government. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:06 am
Jennifer and Steve prefer a combination of the current AUMF and Article II. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 11:47 am
David Allen, Professor – University of Michigan; Patricia Birkholz, Founder – Great Lakes Legislative Caucus; Kathryn Buckner, President – Council of Great Lakes Industries; Naomi Davis, President – Blacks in Green; Molly Flanagan, Program Officer – The Joyce Foundation; Steve Galarneau, Director – Office of the Great Lakes, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources; Jennifer Hill, Field Manager – National Wildlife Federation and Healing Our… [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 10:07 am
Steve Chapman of the Chicago Tribune writes about some of the concerns about drones that animated Rand Paul’s filibuster. [read post]
