Search for: "Stevens v. Thomas"
Results 641 - 660
of 2,084
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2015, 6:55 am
At Justia’s Verdict, Michael Dorf argues that the case made by Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas against the dormant Commerce Clause in Comptroller v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Yet the Court found one in Printz v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 12:41 pm
In Bush v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:46 pm
Stevens (2010) and in Brown v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
, Introduction by Steven D. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 7:35 am
Nebraska and Pierce v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:50 pm
Acuff v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 7:20 am
I attended the oral arguments on March 31 in the Kimble v Marvel case, in which the Court considers whether to overrule Brulotte v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:15 am
The suitwas brought by two plaintiffs: Theresa Troeckler and Candice Zeiser sued Donald Zeiser, Steven Jacobsen, Kyvon Services, LLC, Mark Stueck, William Reynolds and Brighton Lewis, Inc. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 5:46 am
Thomas and the Chief each had one. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 3:05 am
In Young v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
True, Ely himself thought Roe v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 7:27 am
Supreme Court (Presser v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 3:18 am
’” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie outlines what he describes as “a plausible scenario” in which the Chief Justice “may vote in the liberal direction in both King v Burwell,the Obamacare case, and Obergefell v Hodges, the same-sex marriage case. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:21 pm
, INS v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
Thomas E. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 9:06 am
Kemp & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 7:58 am
In other February news, Justice Thomas taught a seminar on the Supreme Court at Creighton University Law School from February 2 to 6. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 5:01 am
” Although the focus was on same-sex marriage and Alabama, coverage of and commentary on King v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 3:36 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re looks at Justice Clarence Thomas’s dissent from the denial of certiorari in Plumley v. [read post]
