Search for: "Stevens v. United States Department Of Justice" Results 641 - 660 of 711
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2009, 12:51 pm
Justice Souter filed a dissenting opinion that was joined by Justices Stevens and Ginsburg. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 1:10 am
When Illinois Congressman Henry Hyde stuck an amendment into an appropriations bill in 1997, the Department of Justice went bonkers. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Justice Stevens, on the contrary, concluded that the holding of 14 Penn Plaza departs from Congressional intent and case law precedent. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:55 pm
As we told you on Wednesday, the Justice Department moved to dismiss former Sen. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:20 am
United States, a Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) suit the couple filed three years ago in the U.S. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:11 am
"   Here is the full text: In connection with the post-trial litigation in United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:11 am
"   Here is the full text: In connection with the post-trial litigation in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 11:46 pm
(In Hamdi Justice Antonin Scalia, joined by Justice John Paul Stevens, wrote of Quirin: "The case was not this Court's finest hour. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 9:07 am
Circuit's opinion in United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 12:26 am
Justice Stevens to Moderate Discussion on 'Marbury' Legal Times Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens will make a rare public appearance Thursday at the Newseum, marking the publication of a new book on the landmark 1803 decision Marbury v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 8:04 am
  Justice Souter dissented, joined by Justices Ginsburg and Stevens. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Tompkins‟ case comports with the United States and Florida Constitutions. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 9:07 am
Department of Justice makes the trial exhibits for United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 10:31 pm
Justice John Paul Stevens, the author of the main opinion in Pacifica, is the only member of the Court still serving. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 11:12 am
The exclusionary rule in the United States is considerably more restrictive of police behavior than its counterparts elsewhere in the world. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 6:44 pm
  In the United State Supreme Court, the State’s counsel, Joesph Maziarz, placed great emphasis on the fact that Belton was settled precedent and the need for a clear, bright-line rule. [read post]