Search for: "Sweet v State"
Results 641 - 660
of 993
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2011, 5:16 am
London : Sweet & Maxwell/Thomson Reutersrs, 2011 viii, 188 p. : ill. ; 25 cm. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am
(IP Osgoode) Canada’s intervention to SCCR 20: ‘International instrument on access to protected materials by persons with print disabilities’ (Knowledge Ecology International) Chile Plum D’Agne – Geographical indication: Chile’s sweet and tasty business (IP tango) China China IP. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:11 am
London : Thomson/Sweet & Maxwell, 2010 ccxxx, 1224 p. ; 24 cm. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 9:52 am
Johnson v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:57 pm
Caputo, 517 F.3d 935 (7th Cir. 2008), but it’s dictum.It’s not all sweetness and light though, as the district court decision being appealed in Caronia demonstrates, United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm
This is Part 1 of an edited extract from a paper presented to the 22nd Sweet & Maxwell Annual Judicial Review Conference on 19 November 2010. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 4:15 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Sarkozy government allegedly caught red-handed infringing DVD copyrights (IP Watch) (IP Factor) District Court S D New York: Court rules that phones ringing in public don't infringe copyright: USA v ASCAP (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Ars Technica) Microsoft asks Federal Circuit to reconsider presumption of patent validity: Lucent… [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 5:15 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Sarkozy government allegedly caught red-handed infringing DVD copyrights (IP Watch) (IP Factor) District Court S D New York: Court rules that phones ringing in public don’t infringe copyright: USA v ASCAP (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Ars Technica) Microsoft asks Federal Circuit to reconsider presumption of patent… [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 4:15 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Sarkozy government allegedly caught red-handed infringing DVD copyrights (IP Watch) (IP Factor) District Court S D New York: Court rules that phones ringing in public don't infringe copyright: USA v ASCAP (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Ars Technica) Microsoft asks Federal Circuit to reconsider presumption of patent validity: Lucent… [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:52 am
” Hill v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 4:49 am
[v] The Vanishing Criminal Jury Trial at 25-29. [read post]
16 May 2016, 8:58 am
And Lucent v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 12:05 pm
But there are also about 150 more cases in New Jersey state court, a jurisdiction where plaintiff lawyers typically harbor high hopes. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 3:23 pm
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 1:29 pm
Mumm & Cie v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 8:04 am
And there were plenty of states where you couldn’t hold public office if you didn’t swear to believe in God (as opposed to Allah, Buddha or a flying plate of spaghetti) until the Torcaso v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 2:52 am
See all stories on this topic  Burks v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 5:38 am
I tend to find students have little awareness of things from the sweet spot of recent history between when high school history ends & they were born so even just showing news clips can be helpful. [read post]
