Search for: "Tenant v. State"
Results 641 - 660
of 3,334
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2019, 1:30 pm
Teresa Ward v LB Hillingdon. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:19 pm
Murray v Raynor [2019] NSWCA 274, a case concerning an email sent between tenants of a building concerning the appellant leaving their mailbox unlocked, thereby allegedly facilitating theft. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:23 am
GF Carneros Tenant, LLC, 2019 WL 5963244 (N.D. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 1:06 pm
The landlord’s response on the appeal stated that by being “less than forthright”, Ms W had been guilty of misconduct. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 4:56 am
People v Vera & Magda Realty Corp., 2019 NY Slip Op 32650(U) (N.Y. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 1:25 pm
The tenant’s tenancy agreement (as revised) stated he had to pay the ‘exact amount’ due for water for the property. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 2:25 pm
City Of London v Various Leaseholders Of Great Arthur House (LANDLORD AND TENANT – SERVICE CHARGES ) (2019) UKUT 341 (LC) This matter arises out a dispute between leaseholders and City of London in respect of the costs of major works to the structure and exterior of Great Arthur House. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Yet Supreme Court cases—especially the 1991 ruling in Gregory v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 7:57 am
A couple of his tenants also got pulled in and named as proposed respondents.The Court has curiously and rather inexplicably declined to let Mr. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 5:19 am
v=lzatElTvT6U. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 9:10 am
” It is well established that where it is possible for works to be done at no cost to a tenant (e.g. under a guarantee), to carry out the works at a cost to the tenant will render that cost unreasonable, unless there is some evidence from the landlord of some disadvantage or good reason to reject the availability of works without cost in favour of incurring a cost (see Continental Property Ventures v White [2007] L&TR 4, cited in F Davey & J… [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:09 am
Knock on effects of this decision Although Upper Tribunal stated at paragraph 32 of the judgement that “the landlord” must be a landlord of the property where the tenant lived, that is not expressly stated in the Act. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 3:19 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:46 pm
Apparently, according to the British Columbia Court of Appeal decision in Robledano v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 11:18 am
Goldsbrough & Anor v CA Property Management Ltd & Ors (HOUSING – HOUSE IN MULTIPLE OCCUPATION) [2019] UKUT 311 (LC) Against whom can a tenant bring a rent repayment order application? [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 10:18 am
This testimony by a Town employee directly conflicted with his affidavit, in which he stated that it would be a dereliction of duty not to consider the safety of the upstairs tenant, or to let safety issues at Al Dente go unchecked. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 1:50 pm
Demus v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:57 am
Now, we have encountered r.13 before (see our note on Willow Court v Alexander here). [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 11:50 am
This would be ‘manifestly without reasonable foundation’, following R (Turley) v Wandsworth LBC (2017) EWCA Civ 189, (2017) HLR 21 and R (DA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (2019) UKSC 21. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 3:22 pm
Ms S – the interested party – was a tenant of NHG. [read post]
