Search for: "The Active v. United States" Results 641 - 660 of 18,200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
United States 15-565 Issue: Whether vertical conduct by a disruptive market entrant, aimed at securing suppliers for a new retail platform, should be condemned as per se illegal under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, rather than analyzed under the rule of reason, because such vertical activity also had the alleged effect of facilitating horizontal collusion among the suppliers. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 8:51 am
Jury verdict of approximately $34 million was reduced 82% to $6.1 million because the jury adopted plaintiff's expert's calculation of damages which was based upon worldwide sales that were "not actually rooted in [defendant's] infringing activity in the United States. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 10:50 am by Allan Blutstein
Dep't of State (D.D.C.) -- ruling that agency properly relied on Exemption 1 to withhold parts of five-page report concerning activities of the “United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Americans United reported Monday that a Massachusetts state trial court has denied a preliminary injunction in Caplan v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 11:59 am by Stella Pulman
United States, highlights the tension between the federal government’s desire to maintain financial security for decommissioning activities, and that of an operator whose security is tied up indefinitely while the government awaits technological advances to allow for safe decommissioning.Continue reading → [read post]
4 May 2012, 4:45 am by Nicholas J. Wagoner
United States—one of the handful of cases that may dramatically reshape our relationship with the federal government. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 2:34 pm
When was the last time you saw the United States sue an entire city. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 6:46 am by MBettman
At issue are certified questions of state law from the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:41 pm by Heidi Meinzer
  For a wonderful analysis of what the Court did and did not do in Stevens, be sure to catch Matthew Liebman’s post on the Animal Legal Defense Fund Blog, Clarifying the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 5:11 am by Yishai Schwartz
By contrast, these organizations’ lobbying and diplomacy activities in the United States appear relatively insignificant. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Castillo v Ochoa, 2012 WL 523696 (D.Nev.) petitioner, Jose Manuel Garza-Castillo sought the return of his child from the United States to Mexico, pursuant to the Convention. [read post]