Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Kennedy"
Results 641 - 660
of 3,161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2009, 3:29 am
Florida and Graham v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 10:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:27 am
"Kennedy?! [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:32 am
Similarly, in U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:44 pm
"Whether those people, on both sides, agree with what the Supreme Court was going to do or not, didn't mean they didn't see it coming. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:45 am
See Cutter v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 8:30 am
Texas and Obergefell v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:31 am
Votes to Accept the Case* Yes: Justices O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, Fischer, and DeWine No: Chief Justice O’Connor *Then-Justice O’Neill not participating Key Statutes and Precedent Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution (“The right of the people to be secure…against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated…”) Article I, Section 14 of the Ohio Constitution (“The right of the people to be… [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
In National Assn of Broadcasters v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:00 am
This was said to have caused harm, particularly to children and young people. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:43 am
Simmons, Kennedy v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Houdek v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:22 pm
In Lucia v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 10:51 am
No. 1, in which Chief Justice Roberts authored the plurality, but Justice Kennedy authored the controlling opinion. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 7:25 pm
As Dan Kennedy notes in his extensive coverage of this case: Yes, Boston.com gives credit to the GateHouse papers, and yes, you have to click through to read the stories. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 2:41 pm
Later, in a second petition for post-conviction relief, Cone raised the claim that the State had violated Brady v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 10:05 am
Romer v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 1:11 pm
Even a swing justice like Anthony Kennedy—like the younger and stunningly rigid Samuel Alito—was willing to adopt the tough-luck argument in its entirety. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:26 am
What is more surprising is that I expected I would find a split in usage between Justice Kennedy and Scalia’s majority and dissenting opinions in Lawrence v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:31 pm
The hearing is open to the public, and people are encouraged to attend! [read post]
