Search for: "The People v. Cross"
Results 641 - 660
of 6,162
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
The topic of malapportionment is well-trodden ground, with established measures borne both of legal necessity following Baker v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
A second follow-up case, Steinmetz et al v Germany, was filed in 2022. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 4:30 pm
From yesterday's U.S. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
Florida and the plaintiffs will cross-appeal the 11th Circuit ruling to the Supreme Court in the very near future. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 7:56 am
Post-conviction non-profit lacked standing to assert First Amendment challenge to South Carolina’s law surrounding disclosure of execution protocols Justice 360 v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 2:15 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s ruling on content moderation in NetChoice v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 5:31 am
Amid intensifying conversations about the post-Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
Rather, proper deference is to the community of experts, all of the people who have spent their careers and considerable talents accumulating knowledge in their field. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Some of them are, both metaphorically and, increasingly literally, old friends, but thanks especially to Richard, I am also meeting some new people and, I hope, making brand-new friends, not infrequently from abroad. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 8:35 am
The Twitter v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 11:13 am
See Knake Jefferson at 34 (citing State ex rel, Okla Bar Ass’n v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 8:48 am
Accts. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
I think the United States crosses that threshold of democratic adequacy, even with the majoritarian weaknesses in contemporary constitutional institutions. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
It is widely accepted that, consistent with the Dormant Commerce Clause, a firm doing multistate business must bear the cost of discovering and complying with state laws—tort laws, tax laws, franchise laws, health laws, privacy laws, and much more—everywhere it does business.[21] People and firms operating in "real space" must take steps to learn and comply with state law in places they visit or do business, or must avoid visiting or doing business in those… [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 9:50 am
Supreme Court case Brady v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Unless a convention of the states assembled pursuant to Article V proceeds to ignore the language of Article V, the current structure of the Senate cannot be changed, and even permissible amendments will need the assent of 38 states. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Purely personal opinion and bias were the key drivers of argument, but neither party was especially in tune with or supportive of the opinions of the other; a case of Paul Simon’s “people talking without speaking, people hearing without listening”. [read post]
3 Sep 2022, 8:51 am
From U.S. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
"[9] "The people have a right to know who is using their courts. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am
He conceded, however, that in the case of a chancel screen of some intrinsic interest in itself, the act of removing it and re-erecting it elsewhere has some of the characteristics of removing a chattel to another location; and that this made it appropriate to consider, as what he termed “a subsidiary issue”, the extent to which the screen is “part of the heritage and history not only of the church, but also of all the people, present and [read post]
