Search for: "The United States v. State of Idaho"
Results 641 - 660
of 851
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2011, 6:21 am
United States, urging the Court to strike Arizona’s controversial immigration law. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:48 am
Idaho v. [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 8:09 pm
August 2002: The military ordered Kathy Johnson, who was a reservist with the United States Army, to prepare for active duty deployment. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
United States, 216 F.R.D. 478, 480 (D. [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:56 pm
United States, 655 F.3d 1124, 1132-34 (9th Cir. 2011)). [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 2:09 pm
Currently, federal law charges the Archivist of the United States with certifying that an amendment has been validly adopted. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are: Haygood v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am
Excise taxes on rental cars are levied at the state-level in 44 states. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:41 pm
” State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
United States, 740 F.2d 1428, 1440 (8th Cir. 1984); Madsen v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
7 Apr 2025, 10:33 am
United States (2022) addressed financial penalties for failing to report foreign bank accounts. [read post]
19 Jan 2025, 4:47 am
However, in 1981, a federal district court ruled in Idaho v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court overturn Roe v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 11:19 am
Senate AI Working Group Releases AI Roadmap: On May 15, the Bipartisan Senate AI Working Group published a roadmap for AI policy in the United States (the “AI Roadmap”). [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 8:04 am
United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 1:10 am
He cited a 1995 Supreme Court opinion - United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:28 am
” The court follows Fourth Circuit precedent (United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 12:09 pm
” Ninth Circuit (California): On December 15, the 9th Circuit took oral argument in its en banc (full court) review of the controversial United States v. [read post]
