Search for: "U. S. v. Park"
Results 641 - 660
of 751
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2010, 11:04 am
Taylor, 529 U. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 10:28 am
Obstrucciones: Rocas, troncos u otros escombros en el agua. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:25 am
At approximately 5:00 P.M. on September 17, Cooke observed [Amaral] arrive in a car and park where Ashley had directed him. [read post]
28 May 2018, 5:54 am
g=a3149e1b-8003-423b-8b01-cc14dec04b47 https://www.tradesecretslaw.com/2018/05/articles/legislation-2/democratic-u-s-senators-seek-to-abolish-non-compete-agreements/? [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”[8] The court went on to observe that “[u]sing enforcement actions to address crypto-assets is simply the latest chapter in a long history of giving meaning to the securities laws through iterative application to new situations. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 1:17 pm
Officer Szymczak located Duncan moments later parked at a motel in a high crime area. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 3:06 pm
"] From Friday's decision in People v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:55 am
“Failing to pay tax liabilities is corporate mismanagement,” ruled the Court in Fernandes v Matrix Model Staffing, Inc. (2022 NY Slip Op 31317(U) [Sup Ct, NY County 2022]), “which defeats a petitioner’s reasonable expectations sufficient to constitute oppression” under Section 1104-a of the Business Corporation Law (the “BCL”). [read post]
20 May 2012, 4:23 am
" I suspect that the Thuuz algorithm worked overtime for a few minutes last week at the conclusion of the Manchester City v Queens Park Rangers English Premier League match. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 2:01 pm
Beyer is cited in the following case: Weed v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
We also consider the extent to which popular sovereignty can be constrained under the U,S, constitutional system.II. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:40 pm
United States, 323 U. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
”[29] And that’s a short list. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 1:44 am
Read the judgement in full here and the ICO’s press release here. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
