Search for: "U. S. v. Smalls"
Results 641 - 660
of 846
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2023, 5:39 pm
From Fideldy v. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 2:20 pm
The court also held that the law, which limited itself to ads for handguns, and only those that were on store premises, was unconstitutionally underinclusive: "[U]nderinclusivity is relevant to Central Hudson's direct advancement prong because it 'may diminish the credibility of the government's rationale for restricting speech in the first place.'" For example, in Pitt News v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 7:10 am
The tool offers small and medium enterprises (SMEs) an easy step-by-step process that will create tailored privacy notices that are geared toward the business’s specific role in the UK economy, such as finance, insurance, law, education, childcare, retail and manufacturing, as well as for the nonprofit sector. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am
Army of the indigenous tribes in the trans-Mississippi West, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the labor injunction, Plessy v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
"Continuous" has been defined as "[u]ninterrupted; unbroken, not intermittent or occasional; so persistently repeated at short intervals as to constitute virtually an unbroken series. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:06 am
That same year, in Caratube v Kazakhstan, confidential information was leaked from the Kazakh government’s IT system and the claimant eventually obtained some of the leaked documents. [read post]
18 May 2016, 11:00 am
For example, in Erwin v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 10:17 pm
In Employment Div. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 3:03 pm
Under Sherbert v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 11:34 am
's interpretation was “not contrary to any express Congressional intent. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Taken together, BRI’s different components serve Beijing’s vision for regional integration under its helm. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 9:05 pm
S. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
In the dissent’s view, the Supreme Court foreclosed debate when it summarized in DeShaney v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm
Therefore §7 of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (MCA), 28 U. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
The FDA acknowledges, for instance, that the acceptable intake is set to mark “a small theoretical increase in risk,” and a “highly hypothetical concept that should not be regarded as a realistic indication of the actual risk,” and thus not an actual risk.[9] The corresponding hypothetical or theoretical risk to the acceptable intake level is clearly small when compared with the human’s lifetime probability of developing cancer (which the FDA… [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
Here's what the court said: [U]pon our review of the record, in view of the conflicting testimony and documentation presented by the parties — reflecting two completely divergent explanations of the facts — resolution of the issue of standing depends, in large part, upon credibility determinations. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 2:09 pm
Genentech, 2015 U. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 11:44 am
Cedar Valley Exteriors, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:34 pm
” Byrne v. [read post]
